Cost-effectiveness of FOLFIRINOX for first-line treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer

被引:36
|
作者
Attard, C. L. [1 ]
Brown, S. [1 ]
Alloul, K. [2 ]
Moore, M. J. [3 ]
机构
[1] Cornerstone Res Grp Inc, Burlington, ON, Canada
[2] Sanofi Canada, Laval, PQ, Canada
[3] Princess Margaret Hosp, Toronto, ON M4X 1K9, Canada
关键词
FOLFIRINOX; gemcitabine; cost-effectiveness; pancreatic cancer; ACCORD trial; chemotherapy; quality-adjusted life year; QALY; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; GEMCITABINE; METAANALYSIS; BENEFIT;
D O I
10.3747/co.21.1327
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background The accord 11/0402 trial demonstrated that FOLFIRINOX (5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan, oxaliplatin) is significantly more efficacious than gemcitabine monotherapy in the first-line treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer (MPC). The present study assessed the cost-effectiveness of first-line FOLFIRINOX compared with first-line gemcitabine for public payers in Canada. Methods A Markov model simulated the movement of MPC patients from first-line treatment until death. Overall survival (os) and progression-free survival (PFS) data were derived from accord. Published utility data and Canadian costs were applied based on time in each health state and on treatment-related adverse event (AE) rates. Costs included first-and second-line therapy, monitoring, and costs to treat AES. Two separate analyses were performed. Analysis 1 was based on trial data [first-line FOLFIRINOX followed by second-line gemcitabine compared with first-line gemcitabine followed by second-line platinum-based chemotherapy, with use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) allowed], and analysis 2 used Ontario treatment patterns before FOLFIRINOX funding (first-line FOLFIRINOX followed by second-line gemcitabine compared with first-line gemcitabine followed by best supportive care, no use of G-CSF). Results Compared with first-line gemcitabine, first-line FOLFIRINOX resulted in more life-years and quality adjusted life-years (QALYS). Probabilistic sensitivity analysis results showed that, for analyses 1 and 2 respectively, FOLFIRINOX has a greater than 85% probability and an approximately 80% probability of being cost-effective at the $100,000 threshold. Conclusions Compared with gemcitabine, first-line FOLFIRINOX significantly prolongs median os. Given the favourable cost per QALY, the improvement in clinical efficacy, and the limited available treatment options, FOLFIRINOX represents an attractive cost-effective treatment for MPC.
引用
收藏
页码:E41 / E51
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Atezolizumab with chemotherapy in first-line treatment for metastatic urothelial cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis
    Zhang, Peng-Fei
    Wen, Feng
    Wu, Qiu-Ji
    Li, Qiu
    JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH, 2022, 11 (14) : 1021 - 1030
  • [2] The efficacy and safety of modified FOLFIRINOX as first-line chemotherapy for Chinese patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer
    Wang, Zhi-Qiang
    Zhang, Fei
    Deng, Ting
    Zhang, Le
    Feng, Fen
    Wang, Feng-Hua
    Wang, Wei
    Wang, De-Shen
    Luo, Hui-Yan
    Xu, Rui-Hua
    Ba, Yi
    Li, Yu-Hong
    CANCER COMMUNICATIONS, 2019, 39
  • [3] Effectiveness and Tolerability of Maintenance Capecitabine Administrated to Patients with Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer Treated with First-Line FOLFIRINOX
    Reure, Juliette
    Follana, Philippe
    Gal, Jocelyn
    Evesque, Ludovic
    Cavaglione, Gerard
    Saint, Angelique
    Francois, Eric
    ONCOLOGY, 2016, 90 (05) : 261 - 266
  • [4] Primary Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor Prophylaxis in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer Patients Treated with FOLFIRINOX as the First-Line Treatment
    Jung, Jae Hyup
    Shin, Dong Woo
    Kim, Jaihwan
    Lee, Jong-Chan
    Hwang, Jin-Hyeok
    CANCERS, 2020, 12 (11) : 1 - 9
  • [5] Cost-Effectiveness of Cetuximab as First-line Treatment for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in the United States
    Shankaran, Veena
    Ortendahl, Jesse D.
    Purdum, Anna G.
    Bolinder, Bjorn
    Anene, Ayanna M.
    Sun, Gordon H.
    Bentley, Tanya G. K.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 2018, 41 (01): : 65 - 72
  • [6] Cost-effectiveness of capecitabine and bevacizumab maintenance treatment after first-line induction treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer
    Franken, M. D.
    van Rooijen, E. M.
    May, A. M.
    Koffijberg, H.
    van Tinteren, H.
    Mol, L.
    ten Tije, A. J.
    Creemers, G. J.
    van der Velden, A. M. T.
    Tanis, B. C.
    Groot, C. A. Uyl-de
    Punt, C. J. A.
    Koopman, M.
    van Oijen, M. G. H.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2017, 75 : 204 - 212
  • [7] Survival and Predictive Factors of Chemotherapy With FOLFIRINOX as First-Line Therapy in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer A Retrospective Multicentric Analysis
    Caron, Benedicte
    Reimund, Jean-Marie
    Ben Abdelghani, Meher
    Sondag, Daniel
    Noirclerc, Monique
    Duclos, Bernard
    Kurtz, Jean-Emmanuel
    Nguimpi-Tambou, Marlene
    PANCREAS, 2021, 50 (06) : 803 - 806
  • [8] Cost-Effectiveness of First-Line Cetuximab in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in Saudi Arabia
    Elsamany, Shereef
    Elsisi, Gihan Hamdy
    Hassanin, Fayza Ahmed Mohamed
    Saleh, Khaldoon
    Tashkandi, Emad
    VALUE IN HEALTH REGIONAL ISSUES, 2022, 28 : 67 - 75
  • [9] Gemcitabine/nab-Paclitaxel versus FOLFIRINOX for palliative first-line treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer: A propensity score analysis
    Riedl, Jakob M.
    Posch, Florian
    Horvath, Lena
    Gantschnigg, Antonia
    Renneberg, Felix
    Schwarzenbacher, Esther
    Moik, Florian
    Barth, Dominik A.
    Rossmann, Christopher H.
    Stotz, Michael
    Schaberl-Moser, Renate
    Pichler, Martin
    Stoger, Herbert
    Greil, Richard
    Djanani, Angela
    Schlick, Konstantin
    Gerger, Armin
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2021, 151 : 3 - 13
  • [10] First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer
    Tokh, Mohammed
    Bathini, Venu
    Saif, Muhammad Wasif
    JOURNAL OF THE PANCREAS, 2012, 13 (02): : 159 - 162