Retrofitting carbon capture and storage to natural gas-fired power plants: A real-options approach

被引:45
作者
Elias, R. S. [1 ]
Wahab, M. I. M. [1 ]
Fang, L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ryerson Univ, Dept Mech & Ind Engn, 350 Victoria St, Toronto, ON M5B 2K3, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Carbon capture and storage retrofitting investment; Real-options approach; Power plant valuation; Clean spark spread option; Emission reduction; INVESTMENT; VALUATION; CCS; FLEXIBILITY; UNCERTAINTY; COST; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.019
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper presents a real-options approach to assess the value of retrofitting carbon capture and storage technology to an existing natural gas-fired base-load power plant. Operating in a deregulated electricity market, a power plant owner seeks to decide whether to retrofit and at what techno-economic conditions to retrofit carbon capture and storage. The value of the plant is determined based on clean spark spread options. Two alternative carbon capture and storage technologies, post-combustion and oxy-fuel combustion, are evaluated. Price uncertainties of electricity and natural gas are modeled as meanreverting processes. The plant is abided by the emission reduction policy of carbon tax or price. Results show that a plant owner would opt for retrofitting post-combustion technology to an existing power plant if the carbon price hits to at least 140 dollars per ton of carbon dioxide, and would select oxy-fuel combustion technology if the carbon price moves further to 185 dollars per ton of carbon dioxide or above. Since parameters of carbon capture and storage vary widely across the literature, sensitivity tests of the expected values to different costs, prices, and volatility parameters are also presented for an insightful comparative view of which carbon capture and storage technology to adopt at what techno-economic conditions. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:722 / 734
页数:13
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   Valuing flexibility: The case of an Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle power plant [J].
Abadie, Luis M. ;
Chamorro, Jose M. .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2008, 30 (04) :1850-1881
[2]   Operating flexibility at power plants: A market valuation [J].
Abadie, Luis M. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL POWER & ENERGY SYSTEMS, 2015, 64 :41-49
[3]  
Anderson RE, 2008, PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME TURBO EXPO 2008, VOL 2, P781
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2008, PRACTICAL FINANCIAL
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2002, REAL OPTIONS ENERGY
[6]  
[Anonymous], CARB CAPT STOR SOL D
[7]  
[Anonymous], INVESTEMENT UNCERTAI
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2014, V80, P1
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2010, Energy Technology Perspectives 2010