MODIS probabilistic cloud masking over the Amazonian evergreen tropical forests: a comparison of machine learning-based methods

被引:6
作者
Gomis-Cebolla, Jose [1 ]
Carlos Jimenez, Juan [1 ]
Antonio Sobrino, Jose [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Valencia, Global Change Unit, Image Proc Lab, Valencia 46010, Spain
关键词
CLEAR-SKY; ALGORITHM; PRODUCTS; CALIPSO; SHADOW;
D O I
10.1080/01431161.2019.1637963
中图分类号
TP7 [遥感技术];
学科分类号
081102 ; 0816 ; 081602 ; 083002 ; 1404 ;
摘要
Amazonian tropical forests play a significant role in global water, carbon and energy cycles. Satellite remote sensing is presented as a feasible means in order to monitor these forests. In particular, the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) is amongst major tools for studying this region. Nevertheless, MODIS operative surface variable retrieval was reported to be impacted by cloud contamination effects. A proper cloud masking is a major consideration in order to ensure accuracy when analysing Amazonian tropical forests current and future status. In the present study, the potential of supervised machine learning algorithms in order to overcome this issue is evaluated. In front of global operative MODIS cloud masking algorithms (MYD35 and the Multi-Angle Implementation of Atmospheric Correction Algorithm (MAIAC)) these algorithms benefit from the fact that they can be optimized to properly represent the local cloud conditions of the region. Models considered were: Gaussian Naive Bayes (GNB), Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA), Quadratic Discriminant Analysis (QDA), Random Forests (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Multilayer Perceptron (MLP). These algorithms are able to provide a continuous measure of cloud masking uncertainty (i.e. a probability estimate of each pixel belonging to clear and cloudy class) and therefore can be used for probabilistic cloud masking. Truth reference dataset (a priori knowledge) requirement was satisfied by considering the collocation of Cloud Profiling Radar (CPR) and Cloud Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization (CALIOP) observations with MODIS sensor. Model performance was tested using three independent datasets: 1) collocated CPR/CALIOP and MODIS data, 2) MODIS manually classified images and 3) in-situ ground data. For satellite image and in-situ testing results were additionally compared to current operative MYD35 (version 6.1) and MAIAC cloud masking algorithms. Satellite image and in-situ testing results show that machine learning algorithms are able to improve MODIS operative cloud masking performance over the region. MYD35 and MAIAC tend to underestimate and overestimate the cloud cover over the study region, respectively. Amongst the models considered, probabilistic algorithms (LDA, GNB and in less extent QDA) provided better performance than RF, SVM and MLP machine learning algorithms as they were able to better deal with the viewing conditions limitation that resulted from collocating MODIS and CPR/CALIOP observations. In particular, best performance was obtained for LDA with a difference in Kappa coefficient (model minus MODIS operative algorithm) of 0.293/0.155 (MYD35/MAIAC, respectively) considering satellite image testing validation. Worst performance was obtained for MLP with a difference in Kappa coefficient of 0.175/0.037. For in-situ testing, models overall accuracy (OA) and Kappa coefficient values are higher than MYD35/MAIAC respective values. Models are computationally efficient (swath image calculation time between 0.37 and 9.49 s) and thus being able to be implanted for remote-sensing vegetation retrieval processing chains over the Amazonian tropical forests. LDA stands out as the best candidate because of its maximum accuracy and minimum computational associated.
引用
收藏
页码:185 / 210
页数:26
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] Discriminating clear sky from clouds with MODIS
    Ackerman, SA
    Strabala, KI
    Menzel, WP
    Frey, RA
    Moeller, CC
    Gumley, LE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1998, 103 (D24) : 32141 - 32157
  • [2] Statistical cloud detection from SEVIRI multispectral images
    Amato, U.
    Antomadis, A.
    Cuomo, V.
    Cutillo, L.
    Franzese, M.
    Murino, L.
    Serio, C.
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2008, 112 (03) : 750 - 766
  • [3] Environmental change and the carbon balance of Amazonian forests
    Aragao, Luiz E. O. C.
    Poulter, Benjamin
    Barlow, Jos B.
    Anderson, Liana O.
    Malhi, Yadvinder
    Saatchi, Sassan
    Phillips, Oliver L.
    Gloor, Emanuel
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL REVIEWS, 2014, 89 (04) : 913 - 931
  • [4] Random forests
    Breiman, L
    [J]. MACHINE LEARNING, 2001, 45 (01) : 5 - 32
  • [5] BULGIN CE, 2018, REMOTE SENS BASEL, V10
  • [6] Cloud and cloud shadow detection in Landsat imagery based on deep convolutional neural networks
    Chai, Dengfeng
    Newsam, Shawn
    Zhang, Hankui K.
    Qiu, Yifan
    Huang, Jingfeng
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 225 : 307 - 316
  • [7] New neural network cloud mask algorithm based on radiative transfer simulations
    Chen, Nan
    Li, Wei
    Gatebe, Charles
    Tanikawa, Tomonori
    Hori, Masahiro
    Shimada, Rigen
    Aoki, Teruo
    Stamnes, Knut
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 219 : 62 - 71
  • [8] Cherkassky V, 1997, IEEE Trans Neural Netw, V8, P1564, DOI 10.1109/TNN.1997.641482
  • [9] A daily merged MODIS Aqua-Terra land surface temperature data set for the conterminous United States
    Crosson, William L.
    Al-Hamdan, Mohammad Z.
    Hemmings, Sarah N. J.
    Wade, Gina M.
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2012, 119 : 315 - 324
  • [10] Intercomparison of remote-sensing based evapotranspiration algorithms over amazonian forests
    Gomis-Cebolla, Jose
    Carlos Jimenez, Juan
    Antonio Sobrino, Jose
    Corbari, Chiara
    Mancini, Marco
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPLIED EARTH OBSERVATION AND GEOINFORMATION, 2019, 80 : 280 - 294