Private Security Companies and Institutional Legitimacy: Corporate and Stakeholder Responsibility

被引:48
作者
Elms, Heather [1 ]
Phillips, Robert A. [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] American Univ, Kogod Sch Business, Washington, DC 20016 USA
[2] Univ Richmond, Robins Sch Business, Richmond, VA 23173 USA
[3] Univ Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22903 USA
[4] Georgetown Univ, Washington, DC 20057 USA
[5] Univ Penn Wharton, Wharton, PA USA
[6] Univ San Diego, San Diego, CA 92110 USA
[7] Cheung Kong Grad Sch Business, Shanghai, Peoples R China
关键词
BUSINESS; ORGANIZATIONS;
D O I
10.5840/beq200919323
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The private provision of security services has attracted a great deal of recent attention, both professional and popular. Much of that attention suggests the questioned moral legitimacy of the private vs. public provision of security. Linking the literature on moral legitimacy and responsibility from new institutional and stakeholder theories, we examine the relationship between moral legitimacy and responsible behavior by both private security companies (PSCs) and their stakeholders. We ask what the moral-legitimacy-enhancing responsibilities of both might be, and contribute to both literatures and their managerial implications by detailing the content of those responsibilities, emphasizing the reciprocal nature of moral obligations. We suggest that the moral legitimacy of the industry depends upon responsible behavior by both PSCs and their stakeholders.
引用
收藏
页码:403 / 432
页数:30
相关论文
共 110 条
[1]  
ALZOLA M, 2007, ANN M SOC BUS ETH PH
[2]  
ANDRESS C, 2007, CONTRACTORS COMBATAN
[3]  
[Anonymous], NEW I ORG ANAL
[4]  
[Anonymous], 17 COAL PROV AUTH
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1964, LAW PHILOS
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2008, SAGE HDB ORG I
[7]  
Ashcroft James., 2006, Making a Killing: The Explosive Story of a Hired Gun in Iraq
[8]  
Avant D.D., 2005, MARKET FORCE CONSEQU
[9]  
Bacevich AndrewJ., 2005, NEW AM MILITARISM AM
[10]  
Basu K, 2008, ACAD MANAGE REV, V33, P122