Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting the probability of live birth in infertile women

被引:2
作者
Zhang, Meng [1 ]
Tian, Hai-Qing [1 ]
Bu, Tao [2 ]
Li, Xia [1 ]
Wan, Xiao-Hui [1 ]
Wang, Duo-Lao [3 ]
Xu, Hua [1 ]
Mao, Xin-Min [1 ]
Wang, Qing-Li [1 ]
La, Xiao-Lin [1 ]
机构
[1] Xinjiang Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Reprod Med Ctr, 137 Liyushan Rd, Urumqi 830054, Xinjiang, Peoples R China
[2] Xinjiang Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Ctr Stat & Informat, Urumqi 830054, Xinjiang, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Liverpool, Liverpool Sch Trop Med, Dept Clin Sci & Int Publ Hlth, Liverpool L69 3BX, Merseyside, England
关键词
In vitro Fertilization/Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection; Live Birth Rate; Nomogram; Predictive Model; Treatment Outcome Prediction; ASSISTED REPRODUCTION; IVF; PREVALENCE; HORMONE; COHORT; RATES; LIFE;
D O I
10.4103/2096-2924.262388
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To develop a nomogram to predict the probability of live birth on the basis of the association of patient characteristics in subfertile individuals or couples. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted from January 2014 to December 2015. A nomogram was built from a training cohort and tested on an independent validation cohort. A total of 2,257 patients who had undergone their first nondonor cycle of in vitro fertilization (IVF) (including intracytoplasmic sperm injection) were randomly split 2:1 into training (n = 1,527) and validation (n = 730) cohorts. Results: There were no statistically significant differences in the patients' baseline and cycle characteristics between the training and validation cohorts. On multiple logistic regression analysis, female age, antral follicle count, tubal factor, anovulation, ethnicity, unexplained fertility, and male factor were significantly associated with live birth. The nomogram had a C-index of 0.700 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.698u0.701) in the training cohort and 0.684 (95% CI: 0.681u0.687) in the validation cohort. Conclusions: Our nomogram can predict the probability of live birth for infertile women and can be used to guide clinicians and couples to decide on an IVF treatment option.
引用
收藏
页码:77 / +
页数:8
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] Abuzeid MI, 2014, FACTS VIEWS VIS OBGY, V6, P145
  • [2] Definitions of infertility and recurrent pregnancy loss
    不详
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2008, 90 : S60 - S60
  • [3] Hormonal Imbalances and Psychological Scars Left Behind in Infertile Men
    Bak, Chong Won
    Seok, Hyun Ha
    Song, Seung-Hun
    Kim, Eun Sun
    Her, Young Sun
    Yoon, Tae Ki
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANDROLOGY, 2012, 33 (02): : 181 - 189
  • [4] A systematic review of tests predicting ovarian reserve and IVF outcome
    Broekmans, F. J.
    Kwee, J.
    Hendriks, D. J.
    Mol, B. W.
    Lambalk, C. B.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION UPDATE, 2006, 12 (06) : 685 - 718
  • [5] The role of antimullerian hormone in prediction of outcome after IVF: comparison with the antral follicle count
    Broer, Simtone L.
    Mol, Ben Willem J.
    Hendriks, Dave
    Broekmans, Frank J. M.
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2009, 91 (03) : 705 - 714
  • [6] Cai Xia, 2011, Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi, V91, P3182
  • [7] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention American Society for Reproductive Medicine Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology, 2017, 2015 ASS REPR TECHN
  • [8] Investigating quality of life and health-related quality of life in infertility: a systematic review
    Chachamovich, Juliana Rigol
    Chachamovich, Eduardo
    Ezer, Helene
    Fleck, Marcelo P.
    Knauth, Daniela
    Passos, Eduardo P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2010, 31 (02) : 101 - 110
  • [9] Mother or nothing: the agony of infertility
    Cui, Weiyuan
    [J]. BULLETIN OF THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION, 2010, 88 (12) : 881 - 882
  • [10] Predicting the chance of live birth for women undergoing IVF: a novel pretreatment counselling tool
    Dhillon, R. K.
    McLernon, D. J.
    Smith, P. P.
    Fishel, S.
    Dowell, K.
    Deeks, J. J.
    Bhattacharya, S.
    Coomarasamy, A.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2016, 31 (01) : 84 - 92