Clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasms: A single-center experience in Southern Taiwan

被引:5
作者
Ko, Chen-Yu [1 ]
Yao, Chih-Chien [1 ,2 ]
Li, Yu-Chi [1 ]
Lu, Lung-Sheng [1 ]
Chou, Yeh-Pin [1 ]
Hu, Ming-Luen [1 ,2 ]
Chiu, Yi-Chun [1 ,2 ]
Chuah, Seng-Kee [1 ,2 ]
Tai, Wei-Chen [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Div Hepatogastroenterol, Dept Internal Med, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
[2] Chang Gung Univ, Coll Med, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
关键词
LATERALLY SPREADING TUMORS; ADENOMA DETECTION RATE; LOCAL RECURRENCE; TERM OUTCOMES; CANCER; RESECTION; RISK;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0275723
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background and aims Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) as an advanced endoscopic procedure can be considered for the removal of colorectal lesions with high suspicion of limited submucosal invasion or cannot be optimally removed by snare-based techniques. We aimed to analyze the clinical outcomes of ESD for colorectal neoplasms in our hospital. Methods We retrospectively enrolled 230 patients with 244 colorectal neoplasms who received ESD procedures from April 2012 to October 2020 at Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital. Clinicopathological data were collected by chart review. We also recorded ESD-related complications and clinical outcomes. Results The average age was 64 years old, with a mean follow-up time of 22.59 months. There was a loss of follow-up in 34 lesions. Most lesions were lateral spreading tumors of the non-granular type. The average ESD time was 51.9 minutes. Nine cases (3.7%) had procedure-related complications, including two intra-procedure perforations (0.8%) and seven delayed bleeding (2.9%) without procedure-related mortality. 241 lesions (98.8%) achieved en-bloc resection, while 207 lesions (84.8%) achieved R0 resection. Most lesions were tubulo-(villous) adenoma. Malignancy included 35 adenocarcinomas and 5 neuroendocrine tumors. No local recurrence was developed during follow-up. Multivariate analysis for long ESD time revealed significance in size >= 10 cm(2) and endoscopist's experience < 3 years. Pre-ESD endoscopic ultrasound revealed good prediction in discrimination of mucosal (sensitivity: 0.90) and submucosal lesion (specificity: 0.67). Conclusions ESD for colorectal neoplasms is an effective and safe technique. Size >= 10 cm(2) and endoscopist's experience < 3 years were significantly associated with long procedure time. Pre-ESD EUS provided a good prediction for colorectal neoplasms in invasion depth.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   Efficacy of Current Traction Techniques for Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection [J].
Abe, Seiichiro ;
Wu, Shih Yea Sylvia ;
Ego, Mai ;
Takamaru, Hiroyuki ;
Sekiguchi, Masau ;
Yamada, Masayoshi ;
Nonaka, Satoru ;
Sakamoto, Taku ;
Suzuki, Haruhisa ;
Yoshinaga, Shigetaka ;
Matsuda, Takahisa ;
Oda, Ichiro ;
Saito, Yutaka .
GUT AND LIVER, 2020, 14 (06) :673-684
[2]   Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Akintoye, Emmanuel ;
Kumar, Nitin ;
Aihara, Hiroyuki ;
Nas, Hala ;
Thompson, Christopher C. .
ENDOSCOPY INTERNATIONAL OPEN, 2016, 4 (10) :E1030-E1044
[3]   Double-clip traction could be superior to the pocket-creation method with cylindrical cap for colonic ESD: a randomized study in an ex vivo model [J].
Albouys, Jeremie ;
Dahan, Martin ;
Lepetit, Hugo ;
Charissoux, Aurelie ;
Guyot, Anne ;
Pioche, Mathieu ;
Legros, Romain ;
Carrier, Paul ;
Loustaud-Ratti, Veronique ;
Geyl, Sophie ;
Jacques, Jeremie .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2021, 35 (03) :1482-1491
[4]   Local recurrence after endoscopic mucosal resection of nonpedunculated colorectal lesions: systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Belderbos, Tim D. G. ;
Leenders, Max ;
Moons, Leon M. G. ;
Siersema, Peter D. .
ENDOSCOPY, 2014, 46 (05) :388-U121
[5]   Short-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasms in a single medical center [J].
Choo, Chung-Ho ;
Yen, Hsu-Heng ;
Yang, Chia-Wei ;
Chen, Yang-Yuan ;
Su, Wei-Wen ;
Soon, Maw-Soan .
ADVANCES IN DIGESTIVE MEDICINE, 2015, 2 (02) :54-60
[6]  
Corley DA, 2014, NEW ENGL J MED, V370, P1298, DOI [10.1056/NEJMoa1309086, 10.1056/NEJMc1405329]
[7]   Endoscopic resection techniques for colorectal neoplasia: Current developments [J].
Dumoulin, Franz Ludwig ;
Hildenbrand, Ralf .
WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2019, 25 (03) :300-307
[8]   Factors Associated With Recurrence of Advanced Colorectal Adenoma After Endoscopic Resection [J].
Facciorusso, Antonio ;
Di Maso, Marianna ;
Serviddio, Gaetano ;
Vendemiale, Gianluigi ;
Spada, Cristiano ;
Costamagna, Guido ;
Muscatiello, Nicola .
CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2016, 14 (08) :1148-+
[9]   Endoscopic submucosal dissection in a European setting. A multi-institutional report of a technique in development [J].
Farhat, S. ;
Chaussade, S. ;
Ponchon, T. ;
Coumaros, D. ;
Charachon, A. ;
Barrioz, T. ;
Koch, S. ;
Houcke, P. ;
Cellier, C. ;
Heresbach, D. ;
Lepilliez, V. ;
Napoleon, B. ;
Bauret, P. ;
Coron, E. ;
Le Rhun, M. ;
Bichard, P. ;
Vaillant, E. ;
Calazel, A. ;
Bensoussan, E. ;
Bellon, S. ;
Mangialavori, L. ;
Robin, F. ;
Prat, F. .
ENDOSCOPY, 2011, 43 (08) :664-670
[10]   Efficacy and adverse events of EMR and endoscopic submucosal dissection for the treatment of colon neoplasms: a meta-analysis of studies comparing EMR and endoscopic submucosal dissection [J].
Fujiya, Mikihiro ;
Tanaka, Kazuyuki ;
Dokoshi, Tatsuya ;
Tominaga, Motoya ;
Ueno, Nobuhiro ;
Inaba, Yuhei ;
Ito, Takahiro ;
Moriichi, Kentaro ;
Kohgo, Yutaka .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2015, 81 (03) :583-595