Efficacy of dental unit disinfectants against Candida spp. and Hartmannella vermiformis

被引:8
作者
Barbot, Vanessa [1 ]
Costa, Damien [1 ]
Deborde, Marie [2 ,3 ]
Imbert, Christine [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Poitiers, UMR CNRS 7267, Lab Ecol & Biol Interact, Poitiers, France
[2] Univ Poitiers, UMR CNRS 7285, Inst Chim Milieux & Mat, Poitiers, France
[3] Univ Poitiers, Fac Med & Pharm, Poitiers, France
来源
PATHOGENS AND DISEASE | 2014年 / 70卷 / 03期
关键词
yeasts; free-living amoebae; tap water; biofilm; disinfection; FREE-LIVING AMEBAS; WATER-SYSTEMS; MICROBIAL-CONTAMINATION; LEGIONELLA-PNEUMOPHILA; HYDROGEN-PEROXIDE; BIOFILMS; MICROORGANISMS; PROLIFERATION; ACANTHAMOEBA; VAHLKAMPFIA;
D O I
10.1111/2049-632X.12127
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Human oral commensal Candida yeasts, as well as environmental free-living amoebae (FLA) such as Hartmannella, are known to be direct or indirect human pathogens. These microorganisms may be isolated from dental unit waterlines (DUWL), because of contamination coming from the tap water and/or a patient's mouth. This study compared the efficacy of commonly used DUWL disinfectants (chlorine, H2O2, and Oxygenal 6 (c)) against three species of Candida (C.albicans, C.glabrata, and C.parapsilosis) and one FLA species (H.vermiformis), growing either as single or as mixed biofilms in tap water. Results showed variable efficacies: H2O2 had no significant activity, while chlorine was effective but only at the highest doses tested, probably not compatible with DUWL uses. Oxygenal 6 (c) was the most efficacious in preventing the growth of yeasts in tap water. However, in the presence of FLA, Oxygenal 6 (c) displayed a reduced antimicrobial activity against sessile C.albicans. In conclusion, none of the tested disinfectants could eradicate yeasts or FLA. Moreover, the antiyeast activity of Oxygenal 6 (c) was reduced in the presence of FLA. Both sessile or planktonic and mixed or single-species conditions should be considered when evaluating the activity of disinfectants for DUWL maintenance. This study also highlighted that FLA should be included in the testing protocols.
引用
收藏
页码:289 / 296
页数:8
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [1] Aitken D, 1996, OPHTHALMOLOGY, V103, P485, DOI 10.1016/S0161-6420(96)30667-2
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1999, J Am Dent Assoc, V130, P1653
  • [3] APHA, 2000, AWWA WEF STAND METH
  • [4] CONTAMINATION OF DENTAL UNIT COOLING WATER WITH ORAL MICROORGANISMS AND ITS PREVENTION
    BAGGA, BSR
    MURPHY, RA
    ANDERSON, AW
    PUNWANI, I
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 1984, 109 (05) : 712 - 716
  • [5] Biofilms augment the number of free-living amoebae in dental unit waterlines
    Barbeau, J
    Buhler, T
    [J]. RESEARCH IN MICROBIOLOGY, 2001, 152 (08) : 753 - 760
  • [6] Barben Jurg, 2009, Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed, V119, P976
  • [7] Update on infectious risks associated with dental unit waterlines
    Barbot, Vanessa
    Robert, Amelie
    Rodier, Marie-Helene
    Imbert, Christine
    [J]. FEMS IMMUNOLOGY AND MEDICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2012, 65 (02): : 196 - 204
  • [8] Saliva promotes survival and even proliferation of Candida species in tap water
    Barbot, Vanessa
    Migeot, Virginie
    Rodier, Marie-Helene
    Deborde, Marie
    Imbert, Christine
    [J]. FEMS MICROBIOLOGY LETTERS, 2011, 324 (01) : 17 - 20
  • [9] Efficacy of anti-retraction devices in preventing bacterial contamination of dental unit water lines
    Berlutti, F
    Testarelli, L
    Vaia, F
    De Luca, M
    Dolci, G
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2003, 31 (02) : 105 - 110
  • [10] Blake G. C., 1963, Brit. Dent. J., V115, P413