Examining the accuracy of lay beliefs about the effects of personality on prosocial behavior

被引:5
作者
Stavrova, Olga [1 ]
Evans, Anthony M. [2 ]
Sleegers, Willem [3 ]
Beest, Ilja [1 ]
机构
[1] Tilburg Univ, Dept Social Psychol, Tilburg, Netherlands
[2] Allstate Corp, Northfield Township, IL USA
[3] Rethink Prior, San Francisco, CA USA
关键词
agreeableness; cooperation; prosocial behavior; social dilemmas; social perception; stereotype accuracy; trust; trustworthiness; ONLINE SOCIAL NETWORKS; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; TEMPORAL STABILITY; TRAITS; AGREEABLENESS; EXTROVERSION; PERCEPTIONS; COOPERATION; POPULARITY; JUDGMENTS;
D O I
10.1002/bdm.2282
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Prior research on personality and prosocial behavior has focused on actor-level effects of personality by examining which personality traits predict individuals' prosocial behavior. But do lay people take into account others' personality when making predictions of others' future prosocial behavior? The present research was designed to answer this question. We focused on two interpersonal traits from the Big Five model, agreeableness and extraversion, and examined whether people have accurate lay beliefs about the effects of these traits on prosocial behavior. The results of four studies showed that participants consistently attributed agreeableness (and to a lesser extent, extraversion) a greater role in predicting others' prosocial behavior compared with the role that it plays in reality. Results were consistent in studies of zero-acquaintance interactions and close relationships and when people predicted both single instances and aggregated measures of others' prosocial behavior. Our results did not depend on participants' awareness of research hypotheses and persisted even when they were explicitly warned that the information about others' personality might not be accurate. These findings inform the literature on social perception and stereotype accuracy and contribute to our understanding of how people make future-oriented predictions of others' behavior.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 59 条
[41]   The disparity between the actual and assumed power of self-interest [J].
Miller, DT ;
Ratner, RK .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 74 (01) :53-62
[42]   Personality traits, empathy and bullying behavior: A meta-analytic approach [J].
Mitsopoulou, Effrosyni ;
Giovazolias, Theodoros .
AGGRESSION AND VIOLENT BEHAVIOR, 2015, 21 :61-72
[43]  
Moran S., 2008, Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, V1, P3, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-4716.2007.00002.x, DOI 10.1111/J.1750-4716.2007.00002.X]
[44]   The relative influence of trustor and trustee individual differences on peer assessments of trust [J].
Naber, Andrew M. ;
Payne, Stephanie C. ;
Webber, Sheila Simsarian .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2018, 128 :62-68
[45]  
Ross L., 1977, Advances in experimental social psychology, V10, P173, DOI 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60357-3
[46]  
Ross L., 2011, The Person and the Situation: Perspectives of Social Psychology
[47]  
Rubin M., 2016, The Perceived Awareness of the Research Hypothesis Scale: Assessing the Influence of Demand Characteristics, DOI [DOI 10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.4315778, 10.6084/m9.figshare.4315778, DOI 10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.4315778.V2]
[48]   Emerging Late Adolescent Friendship Networks and Big Five Personality Traits: A Social Network Approach [J].
Selfhout, Maarten ;
Burk, William ;
Branje, Susan ;
Denissen, Jaap J. A. ;
van Aken, Marcel ;
Meeus, Wim .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY, 2010, 78 (02) :509-538
[49]   Solidarity and Social Justice: Effect of Individual Differences in Justice Sensitivity on Solidarity Behaviour [J].
Stavrova, Olga ;
Schloesser, Thomas .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY, 2015, 29 (01) :2-16
[50]   Personality Expression and Impression Formation in Online Social Networks: An Integrative Approach to Understanding the Processes of Accuracy, Impression Management and Meta-accuracy [J].
Stopfer, Juliane M. ;
Egloff, Boris ;
Nestler, Steffen ;
Back, Mitja D. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY, 2014, 28 (01) :73-94