Postindustrial Fertility Ideals, Intentions, and Gender Inequality: A Comparative Qualitative Analysis

被引:51
作者
Brinton, Mary C. [1 ]
Bueno, Xiana [2 ]
Olah, Livia [3 ]
Hellum, Merete [4 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Sociol, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[3] Stockholm Univ, Dept Sociol, Demog, Stockholm, Sweden
[4] Univ Gothenburg, Dept Sociol & Work Sci, Gothenburg, Sweden
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”; 美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
LABOR-MARKET INSTITUTIONS; DIVISION-OF-LABOR; 2ND BIRTHS; FAMILY-SIZE; CHILDBEARING DESIRES; HOUSING CONDITIONS; CHEAP ETHNOGRAPHY; EQUITY; BEHAVIOR; COHABITATION;
D O I
10.1111/padr.12128
中图分类号
C921 [人口统计学];
学科分类号
摘要
Fertility ideals remain centered on two children per woman in most postindustrial societies, presenting a puzzle for demographers interested in explaining very low fertility. This article explores the conditions producing a gap between fertility ideals and intentions among highly educated young women and men in four postindustrial countries. We employ in-depth interviews to analyze reasoning about fertility ideals and intentions in two countries with very low fertility (Japan and Spain) and two with slightly higher fertility (the United States and Sweden). We find that American and Swedish female interviewees are more likely than those in Japan and Spain to cite work/family conflict as a reason for their ideals/intentions gap. Our results also suggest that gender inequality is more important in generating low fertility intentions among highly educated interviewees in Japan than Spain. Taken together, these findings suggest complexities in how gender inequality affects fertility intentions among the highly educated in postindustrial contexts.
引用
收藏
页码:281 / +
页数:30
相关论文
共 93 条
[1]   The interplay of employment uncertainty and education in explaining second births in Europe [J].
Adsera, Alicia .
DEMOGRAPHIC RESEARCH, 2011, 25 :513-544
[2]   Job bust, baby bust?: Evidence from Spain [J].
Ahn, N ;
Mira, P .
JOURNAL OF POPULATION ECONOMICS, 2001, 14 (03) :505-521
[3]   Low Fertility, Socioeconomic Development, and Gender Equity [J].
Anderson, Thomas ;
Kohler, Hans-Peter .
POPULATION AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW, 2015, 41 (03) :381-+
[4]   Gendering family composition: Sex preferences for children and childbearing behavior in the Nordic countries [J].
Andersson, Gunnar ;
Hank, Karsten ;
Ronsen, Marit ;
Vikat, Andres .
DEMOGRAPHY, 2006, 43 (02) :255-267
[5]  
Andersson Gunnar, 2002, DEMOGR RES, V3, P65
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2017, GLOBAL GENDER GAP RE
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2017, Education at a glance 2017: OECD indicators
[8]   How Do Changes in Gender Role Attitudes Towards Female Employment Influence Fertility? A Macro-Level Analysis [J].
Arpino, Bruno ;
Esping-Andersen, Gosta ;
Pessin, Lea .
EUROPEAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2015, 31 (03) :370-382
[9]   A Cognitive-Social Model of Fertility Intentions [J].
Bachrach, Christine A. ;
Morgan, S. Philip .
POPULATION AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW, 2013, 39 (03) :459-485
[10]   INTERACTION BETWEEN QUANTITY AND QUALITY OF CHILDREN [J].
BECKER, GS ;
LEWIS, HG .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1973, 81 (02) :S279-S288