On the influence of optimization algorithm and initial design on wing aerodynamic shape optimization

被引:88
|
作者
Yu, Yin [1 ]
Lyu, Zhoujie [1 ]
Xu, Zelu [1 ]
Martins, Joaquim R. R. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Aerosp Engn, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
Aerodynamic shape optimization; Wing design; Computational fluid dynamics; NAVIER-STOKES EQUATIONS; AEROSTRUCTURAL OPTIMIZATION; CONSTRAINED OPTIMIZATION; AIRCRAFT; CONFIGURATION; MINIMIZATION; FORMULATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ast.2018.01.016
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
Aerodynamic shape optimization is a useful tool in wing design, but the impact of the choice of optimization algorithm and the multimodality of the design space in wing design optimization is still poorly understood. To address this, we benchmark both gradient-based and gradient-free optimization algorithms for computational fluid dynamics based aerodynamic shape optimization problems based on the Common Research Model wing geometry. The aerodynamic model solves the Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes equations with a Spalart-Allmaras turbulence model. The drag coefficient is minimized subject to lift, pitching moment, and geometry constraints, with up to 720 shape variables and 11 twist variables for two mesh sizes. We benchmark six gradient-based and three gradient-free algorithms by comparing both the accuracy of the optima and the computational cost. Most of the optimizers reach similar optima, but the gradient-based methods converge to more accurate solutions at a much lower computational cost. Since multimodality and nonsmoothness of the design space are common arguments for the use of gradient-free methods, we investigate these issues by solving the same optimization problem starting from a series of randomly generated initial geometries, as well as a wing based on the NACA 0012 airfoil with zero twist and constant thickness-to-chord ratio. All the optimizations consistently converge to practically identical results, where the differences in drag are within 0.05%, and the shapes and pressure distributions are very similar. Our overall conclusion is that the design space for wing design optimization with a fixed planform is largely convex, with a very small flat region that is multimodal because of numerical errors, However, this region is so small, and the differences in drag so minor, that the design space can be considered unimodal for all practical purposes. (C) 2018 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:183 / 199
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] CANARD-WING SHAPE OPTIMIZATION WITH AERODYNAMIC REQUIREMENTS
    DESILVA, BME
    CARMICHAEL, RL
    JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT, 1978, 15 (11): : 705 - 706
  • [12] Cross Validation of Aerodynamic Shape Optimization Methodologies for Aircraft Wing-Body Optimization
    Reist, Thomas A.
    Koo, David
    Zingg, David W.
    Bochud, Pascal
    Castonguay, Patrice
    Leblond, David
    AIAA JOURNAL, 2020, 58 (06) : 2581 - 2595
  • [13] Wing aerodynamic optimization method for aircraft family design
    Yong, Mingpei
    Yu, Xiongqing
    Nanjing Hangkong Hangtian Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2008, 40 (04): : 475 - 479
  • [14] Integrated aerodynamic/structural design optimization for wing of trunkliner
    Dong, Bo
    Zhang, Xiao-Dong
    Li, Zheng-Neng
    Beijing Hangkong Hangtian Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2002, 28 (04): : 435 - 437
  • [15] Manifold Learning for Aerodynamic Shape Design Optimization
    Zheng, Boda
    Moni, Abhijith
    Yao, Weigang
    Xu, Min
    AEROSPACE, 2025, 12 (03)
  • [16] Aerodynamic shape design and optimization: status and trends
    Dulikravich, George S., 1600, (29):
  • [17] AERODYNAMIC SHAPE DESIGN AND OPTIMIZATION - STATUS AND TRENDS
    DULIKRAVICH, GS
    JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT, 1992, 29 (06): : 1020 - 1026
  • [18] Comparison of optimization algorithms for aerodynamic shape design
    Obayashi, S
    Tsukahara, T
    AIAA JOURNAL, 1997, 35 (08) : 1413 - 1415
  • [19] A surrogate-based integrated framework for the aerodynamic design optimization of a subsonic wing planform shape
    Benaouali, Abdelkader
    Kachel, Stanislaw
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART G-JOURNAL OF AEROSPACE ENGINEERING, 2018, 232 (05) : 872 - 883
  • [20] A FAST GRID DEFORMATION ALGORITHM FOR AERODYNAMIC SHAPE OPTIMIZATION
    Mohamed, Kaveh
    Sermeus, Kurt
    Laurendeau, Eric
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME INTERNATIONAL DESIGN ENGINEERING TECHNICAL CONFERENCES AND COMPUTERS AND INFORMATION IN ENGINEERING CONFERENCE 2010, VOL 1, PTS A AND B, 2010, : 487 - 495