On the influence of optimization algorithm and initial design on wing aerodynamic shape optimization

被引:88
|
作者
Yu, Yin [1 ]
Lyu, Zhoujie [1 ]
Xu, Zelu [1 ]
Martins, Joaquim R. R. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Aerosp Engn, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
Aerodynamic shape optimization; Wing design; Computational fluid dynamics; NAVIER-STOKES EQUATIONS; AEROSTRUCTURAL OPTIMIZATION; CONSTRAINED OPTIMIZATION; AIRCRAFT; CONFIGURATION; MINIMIZATION; FORMULATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ast.2018.01.016
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
Aerodynamic shape optimization is a useful tool in wing design, but the impact of the choice of optimization algorithm and the multimodality of the design space in wing design optimization is still poorly understood. To address this, we benchmark both gradient-based and gradient-free optimization algorithms for computational fluid dynamics based aerodynamic shape optimization problems based on the Common Research Model wing geometry. The aerodynamic model solves the Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes equations with a Spalart-Allmaras turbulence model. The drag coefficient is minimized subject to lift, pitching moment, and geometry constraints, with up to 720 shape variables and 11 twist variables for two mesh sizes. We benchmark six gradient-based and three gradient-free algorithms by comparing both the accuracy of the optima and the computational cost. Most of the optimizers reach similar optima, but the gradient-based methods converge to more accurate solutions at a much lower computational cost. Since multimodality and nonsmoothness of the design space are common arguments for the use of gradient-free methods, we investigate these issues by solving the same optimization problem starting from a series of randomly generated initial geometries, as well as a wing based on the NACA 0012 airfoil with zero twist and constant thickness-to-chord ratio. All the optimizations consistently converge to practically identical results, where the differences in drag are within 0.05%, and the shapes and pressure distributions are very similar. Our overall conclusion is that the design space for wing design optimization with a fixed planform is largely convex, with a very small flat region that is multimodal because of numerical errors, However, this region is so small, and the differences in drag so minor, that the design space can be considered unimodal for all practical purposes. (C) 2018 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:183 / 199
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Influence of Design Space on Aerodynamic Shape Optimization
    Wang, Yihua
    Duan, Yanhui
    2023 ASIA-PACIFIC INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON AEROSPACE TECHNOLOGY, VOL II, APISAT 2023, 2024, 1051 : 506 - 522
  • [2] Aerodynamic optimization of transonic wing design based on evolutionary algorithm
    Oyama, A
    Obayashi, S
    Nakahashi, K
    Nakamura, T
    THIRD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NONLINEAR PROBLEMS IN AVIATION AND AEROSPACE, VOLS 1 AND 2, PROCEEDINGS, 2002, : 537 - 546
  • [3] Aerodynamic wing shape optimization based on the computational design framework CEASIOM
    Zhang, Mengmeng
    Rizzi, Arthur
    AIRCRAFT ENGINEERING AND AEROSPACE TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 89 (02): : 262 - 273
  • [4] Aerodynamic Design of the Supersonic Aircraft Wing-Shape and Wing-Twist Optimization
    Li, Li
    Bai, Junqiang
    Guo, Tongbiao
    He, Xiaolong
    Fu, Ziyuan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AERONAUTICAL AND SPACE SCIENCES, 2018, 19 (02) : 340 - 353
  • [5] Aerodynamic Design of the Supersonic Aircraft Wing-Shape and Wing-Twist Optimization
    Li Li
    Junqiang Bai
    Tongbiao Guo
    Xiaolong He
    Ziyuan Fu
    International Journal of Aeronautical and Space Sciences, 2018, 19 : 340 - 353
  • [6] Aerodynamic shape optimization of an airliner elastic wing
    Navratil, Jan
    12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE APPLIED MATHEMATICAL PROGRAMMING AND MODELLING-APMOD 2016, 2017, 14
  • [7] Multimodality in aerodynamic wing design optimization
    Bons, Nicolas P.
    He, Xiaolong
    Mader, Charles A.
    Martins, Joaquim R.R.A.
    AIAA Journal, 2019, 57 (03): : 1004 - 1018
  • [8] A novel improved fruit fly optimization algorithm for aerodynamic shape design optimization
    Tian, Xu
    Li, Jie
    KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2019, 179 : 77 - 91
  • [9] Multimodality in Aerodynamic Wing Design Optimization
    Bons, Nicolas P.
    He, Xiaolong
    Mader, Charles A.
    Martins, Joaquim R. R. A.
    AIAA JOURNAL, 2019, 57 (03) : 1004 - 1018
  • [10] Aerodynamic Shape Optimization Design of the Swept Wing based on the Kriging surrogate model
    Wang, Dan
    Bai, Junqiang
    Hua, Jun
    Sun, Zhiwei
    Qiao, Lei
    ADVANCES IN COMPUTATIONAL MODELING AND SIMULATION, PTS 1 AND 2, 2014, 444-445 : 1277 - +