Nursery habitat availability limits adult stock sizes of predatory coastal fish

被引:95
作者
Sundblad, Goran [1 ]
Bergstrom, Ulf [2 ]
Sandstrom, Alfred [3 ]
Eklov, Peter [1 ]
机构
[1] Uppsala Univ, Dept Ecol & Genet, S-75236 Uppsala, Sweden
[2] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Inst Coastal Res, Dept Aquat Resources, S-74242 Oregrund, Sweden
[3] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Inst Freshwater Res, Dept Aquat Resources, S-17893 Drottningholm, Sweden
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
coastal management; conservation; essential fish habitat; fisheries management; generalized additive models; maximum entropy; niche models; random forest; species distribution modelling; PERCH PERCA-FLUVIATILIS; OF-THE-YEAR; SPECIES DISTRIBUTION; LIFE-HISTORY; RECRUITMENT; PREDICTION; FISHERIES; AREAS; SEA; COMMUNITIES;
D O I
10.1093/icesjms/fst056
中图分类号
S9 [水产、渔业];
学科分类号
0908 ;
摘要
Habitat protection is a strategy often proposed in fisheries management to help maintain viable populations of exploited species. Yet, quantifying the importance of habitat availability for population sizes is difficult, as the precise distribution of essential habitats is poorly known. To quantify the contribution from coastal nursery habitats to exploited fish population sizes, we related adult density to the amount of nursery habitat available for 12 populations of the two dominant predatory fish species in a 40 000-km(2) archipelago area of the Baltic Sea. Habitat distribution was mapped using three conceptually different techniques, Maxent, generalized additive models, and random forest, using spawning and 0-group point samples. Adult densities were estimated from gillnet surveys. Regressions demonstrated no evident effect from fishing, whereas habitat availability had a positive effect, explaining almost half of the variation in population sizes of both species. This result shows that a substantial proportion of the potential production of adult fish can be estimated by mapping essential nursery habitats distribution. Responses were non-linear, indicating that habitat protection has largest effects where there is little available habitat. By demonstrating the importance of habitat limitation of two exploited fish species, we provide quantitative support to the benefits of habitat protection for fisheries.
引用
收藏
页码:672 / 680
页数:9
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]   Unlocking the potential of protected areas for freshwaters [J].
Abell, Robin ;
Allan, J. David ;
Lehner, Bernhard .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2007, 134 (01) :48-63
[2]  
Ådjers K, 2006, BOREAL ENVIRON RES, V11, P13
[3]  
Airoldi L, 2007, OCEANOGR MAR BIOL, V45, P345
[4]   Ensemble forecasting of species distributions [J].
Araujo, Miguel B. ;
New, Mark .
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2007, 22 (01) :42-47
[5]   Food for thought - Habitat-fisheries interactions: a missing link? [J].
Armstrong, Claire W. ;
Falk-Petersen, Jannike .
ICES JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE, 2008, 65 (06) :817-821
[6]  
Bergstrom U., J APPL ECOL IN PRESS
[7]   Random forests [J].
Breiman, L .
MACHINE LEARNING, 2001, 45 (01) :5-32
[8]   Impact of oligotrophication, temperature, and water levels on walleye habitat in the Bay of Quinte, Lake Ontario [J].
Chu, C ;
Minns, CK ;
Moore, JE ;
Millard, ES .
TRANSACTIONS OF THE AMERICAN FISHERIES SOCIETY, 2004, 133 (04) :868-879
[9]  
Craig JF., 2000, Percid Fishes: Systematics, ecology, and exploitation
[10]   Random forests for classification in ecology [J].
Cutler, D. Richard ;
Edwards, Thomas C., Jr. ;
Beard, Karen H. ;
Cutler, Adele ;
Hess, Kyle T. .
ECOLOGY, 2007, 88 (11) :2783-2792