The effect of feedback from post-operative 3D CT on placement of femoral tunnels in single-bundle anatomic ACL reconstruction

被引:31
作者
Inderhaug, Eivind [1 ,2 ]
Larsen, Allan [3 ]
Strand, Torbjorn [1 ]
Waaler, Per Arne [2 ]
Solheim, Eirik [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Haraldsplass Deaconess Hosp, Dept Surg, Pb 6165, Bergen, Norway
[2] Univ Bergen, Fac Med & Dent, Dept Clin Med, Mons, Belgium
[3] Teres Bergen, Nesttun, Norway
关键词
ACL; Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; Anteromedial portal; 3D CT; ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT; 3-DIMENSIONAL COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; LATERAL INTERCONDYLAR RIDGE; FOOTPRINT; LANDMARKS; KNEE; POSITIONS;
D O I
10.1007/s00167-014-3355-0
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
To evaluate the effect of feedback from post-operative 3D CT in the learning process of placing the femoral graft tunnel anatomically using the anteromedial (AM)-portal technique in single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. An experienced knee surgeon converting from transtibial to AM-portal technique was offered post-operative feedback on tunnel placement. Three groups of patients were included: transtibial drilling, (AM1) anteromedial drilling without feedback and (AM2) anteromedial drilling with post-operative CT feedback. Intra-articular landmarks were used as the only guidance for tunnel placement. Tunnel position was compared to an ideal anatomical ACL position using the Bernard and Hertel grid and visual feedback was given on tunnel placements. The effect of feedback was measured as the distance from the anatomical centre, and spread of tunnel placements on post-operative CT performed feedback was initiated. When comparing the femoral tunnel placement to an ideal anatomical centre, there was an improvement in the mean tunnel position after (A) changing from a transtibial to an anatomical technique and a further improvement after (B) initializing the radiological feedback. There was a great variation of femoral tunnel localizations when initially only using intra-articular landmarks as guidance for tunnel placement-this variation, however, converged towards the anatomical centre throughout the feedback period and the AM2 group had a femoral tunnel closer (P = 0.001) to the anatomical centre than the AM1 group. Post-operative 3D CT is effective in the learning process of placing femoral tunnels anatomically by giving post-operative feedback on tunnel placement. Bony landmarks and ACL remnants were found unreliable as the only guidance for femoral tunnel placement in the AM-portal technique-therefore, the use of an aid is recommended to reduce unwanted tunnel variations in a learning phase. Cohort Study, Level III.
引用
收藏
页码:154 / 160
页数:7
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [21] Comparison of 4 Femoral Tunnel Drilling Techniques in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
    Larson, Andrew I.
    Bullock, Daniel P.
    Pevny, Tomas
    [J]. ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2012, 28 (07) : 972 - 979
  • [22] Comparative Analysis of Femoral Tunnels Between Outside-In and Transtibial Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A 3-Dimensional Computed Tomography Study
    Lee, Yong Seuk
    Sim, Jae Ang
    Kwak, Ji Hoon
    Nam, Shin Woo
    Kim, Kwang Hee
    Lee, Beom Koo
    [J]. ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2012, 28 (10) : 1417 - 1423
  • [23] Anatomic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction: a global perspective. Part 1
    Middleton, K. K.
    Hamilton, T.
    Irrgang, J. J.
    Karlsson, J.
    Harner, C. D.
    Fu, F. H.
    [J]. KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2014, 22 (07) : 1467 - 1482
  • [24] Varying femoral tunnels between the anatomical footprint and isometric positions - Effect on kinematics of the anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knee
    Musahl, V
    Plakseychuk, A
    VanScyoc, A
    Sasaki, T
    Debski, RE
    McMahon, PJ
    Fu, FH
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2005, 33 (05) : 712 - 718
  • [25] Radiological landmarks for placement of the tunnels in single-bundle reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament
    Pinczewski, L. A.
    Salmon, L. J.
    Jackson, W. F. M.
    von Bormann, R. P. B.
    Haslam, P. G.
    Tashiro, S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2008, 90B (02): : 172 - 179
  • [26] Increased Risk of Revision After Anteromedial Compared With Transtibial Drilling of the Femoral Tunnel During Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Results from the Danish Knee Ligament Reconstruction Register
    Rahr-Wagner, Lene
    Thillemann, Theis Muncholm
    Pedersen, Alma Becic
    Lind, Martin Caroe
    [J]. ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2013, 29 (01) : 98 - 105
  • [27] Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries: Anatomy, Physiology, Biomechanics, and Management
    Siegel, Leon
    Vandenakker-Albanese, Carol
    Siegel, David
    [J]. CLINICAL JOURNAL OF SPORT MEDICINE, 2012, 22 (04): : 349 - 355
  • [28] Snow M, 2012, KNEE SURG SPORT TR A, V18, P1195
  • [29] Clinical outcome of anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction and 3D CT model-based validation of femoral socket aperture position
    Taketomi, Shuji
    Inui, Hiroshi
    Nakamura, Kensuke
    Hirota, Jinso
    Sanada, Takaki
    Masuda, Hironari
    Takeda, Hideki
    Tanaka, Sakae
    Nakagawa, Takumi
    [J]. KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2014, 22 (09) : 2194 - 2201
  • [30] Three-Dimensional Fluoroscopic Navigation Guidance for Femoral Tunnel Creation in Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
    Taketomi, Shuji
    Inui, Hiroshi
    Nakamura, Kensuke
    Hirota, Jinso
    Takei, Seira
    Takeda, Hideki
    Tanaka, Sakae
    Nakagawa, Takumi
    [J]. ARTHROSCOPY TECHNIQUES, 2012, 1 (01): : E95 - E99