共 50 条
Outcomes of Patients With Metastatic Melanoma Treated With Immunotherapy Prior to or After BRAF Inhibitors
被引:195
|作者:
Ackerman, Allison
[1
]
Klein, Oliver
[2
]
McDermott, David F.
[1
]
Wang, Wei
[3
]
Ibrahim, Nageatte
[4
]
Lawrence, Donald P.
[5
]
Gunturi, Anasuya
[1
]
Flaherty, Keith T.
[5
]
Hodi, F. Stephen
[4
]
Kefford, Richard
[2
,6
,7
,8
]
Menzies, Alexander M.
[7
,8
]
Atkins, Michael B.
[9
]
Long, Georgina V.
[6
,7
,8
]
Sullivan, Ryan J.
[5
]
机构:
[1] Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Dept Med, Div Oncol, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[2] Westmead Hosp, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Div Sleep Med, Dept Med, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] Dana Farber Canc Inst, Dept Med Oncol, Melanoma Dis Ctr, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[5] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Ctr Canc, Ctr Melanoma, Boston, MA USA
[6] Westmead Hosp, Westmead Millennium Inst, Westmead Inst Canc Res, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[7] Univ Sydney, Discipline Med, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[8] Melanoma Inst Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[9] Georgetown Lombardi Comprehens Canc Ctr, Washington, DC USA
来源:
关键词:
vemurafenib;
sequencing;
ipilimumab;
melanoma;
BRAF;
IMPROVED SURVIVAL;
MEK INHIBITION;
OPEN-LABEL;
IPILIMUMAB;
SAFETY;
MULTICENTER;
VEMURAFENIB;
DABRAFENIB;
RESPONSES;
ANTI-PD-1;
D O I:
10.1002/cncr.28620
中图分类号:
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号:
100214 ;
摘要:
BACKGROUNDThe immunotherapy (IT) agents ipilimumab and interleukin-2 as well as BRAF inhibitors (BRAFi) vemurafenib and dabrafenib, with or without trametinib (MEK inhibitors), are all FDA-approved treatments for BRAF metastatic melanoma, but there are few studies to guide optimal sequencing. This retrospective analysis describes the outcomes of patients treated with either BRAFi before IT or IT before BRAFi. METHODSA cohort of patients treated with BRAFi alone or with MEK inhibitor was retrospectively identified. Response rate (RR), overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) were evaluated for the entire cohort, subdivided by BRAFi prior to or after IT. RESULTSRR and median PFS and OS calculated from commencement of BRAFi following IT (N=32) were 57%, 6.7 months (95% confidence interval [CI]=4.3-9.1 months), and 19.6 months (95% CI=10.0-undefined months), respectively; whereas for BRAFi initially (N=242) were 66%, 5.6 months (95% CI=4.7-6.8 months), and 13.4 months (95% CI=10.1-17.0 months). Results were similar when controlled for prognostic variables. A total of 193 patients discontinued BRAFi, with OS of 2.9 months (range of 1.8-4.4 months) from day of BRAFi discontinuation. Forty patients subsequently received IT with ipilimumab. Only half could complete 4 doses of ipilimumab; PFS with ipilimumab was 2.7 months (95% CI=1.8-3.1 months) and OS was 5.0 months (95% CI=3.0-8.8 months). CONCLUSIONSIn this retrospective analysis, prior treatment with IT does not appear to negatively influence response to BRAFi. Outcomes for IT with ipilimumab following BRAFi discontinuation are poor. Randomized controlled trials are needed to define if sequencing IT prior to BRAFi therapy is superior to sequencing BRAFi prior to IT. Cancer 2014;120:1695-1701. (c) 2014 American Cancer Society.
引用
收藏
页码:1695 / 1701
页数:7
相关论文