Mapping Europe's institutional landscape for forest ecosystem service provision, innovations and governance

被引：49

作者：

Primmer, Eeva ^{[1
]}

Varumo, Liisa ^{[1
]}

Krause, Torsten ^{[2
]}

Orsi, Francesco ^{[3
,4
]}

Geneletti, Davide ^{[5
]}

Brogaard, Sara ^{[2
]}

Aukes, Ewert ^{[5
]}

Ciolli, Marco ^{[5
]}

Grossmann, Carol ^{[6
]}

Hernandez-Morcillo, Monica ^{[7
]}

Kister, Jutta ^{[8
]}

Kluvankova, Tatiana ^{[9
,10
]}

Loft, Lasse ^{[11
]}

Maier, Carolin ^{[6
]}

Meyer, Claas ^{[11
]}

Schleyer, Christian ^{[8
]}

Spacek, Martin ^{[12
,13
]}

Mann, Carsten ^{[7
]}

机构：

[1] Finnish Environm Inst, Helsinki, Finland

[2] Lund Univ, Ctr Sustainabil Studies, Lund, Sweden

[3] Wageningen Univ & Res, Landscape Architecture & Spatial Planning Grp, Wageningen, Netherlands

[4] Kansas State Univ, Dept Geog & Geospatial Sci, Manhattan, KS 66506 USA

[5] Univ Twente, Enschede, Netherlands

[6] Forest Res Inst Baden Wuerttemberg, Freiburg, Germany

[7] Eberswalde Univ Sustainable Dev, Eberswalde, Germany

[8] Univ Innsbruck, Dept Geog, Innsbruck, Austria

[9] Slovak Univ Technol Bratislava, SlovakGlobe Slovak Acad Sci, Vazovova 5, Bratislava 81243, Slovakia

[10] CETIP, Ctr Transdisciplinary Studies No, Vazovova 5, Bratislava 81243, Slovakia

[11] Leibniz Ctr Agr Landscape Res, Muncheberg, Germany

[12] CETIP, Ctr Transdisciplinary Studies, Usti Nad Labem, Czech Republic

[13] Univ Jan Evangelista Purkyn Usti Nad Labem, Usti Nad Labem, Czech Republic

来源：

ECOSYSTEM SERVICES | 2021年 / 47卷

关键词：

Institutional landscape; Forest ecosystem services; Ecosystem services governance; Document analysis; Innovations; Policy analysis; BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION; POLICY MIXES; MANAGEMENT; FRAMEWORK; PAYMENTS; INTEGRATION; IMPLEMENTATION; CHALLENGES; TRADEOFFS; MARKETS;

D O I：

10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101225

中图分类号：

Q14 [生态学（生物生态学）];

学科分类号：

071012 ; 0713 ;

摘要：

There has been a strong quest for mapping and assessing ecosystem services (ES) to support governance. Yet, the institutional landscape that governs ES provision across multiple contexts has received less attention. We fill this research gap by developing and operationalising a framework for the analysis of policy documents that address European forest ES provision. By coding and analysing references to forest ES as well as innovations and governance mechanisms addressing these ES in national strategies on forest, biodiversity and bioeconomy, we map the institutional landscape of forest ES provision in Europe. We further analyse how biophysical supply of forest ES is connected to policies paying attention to ES and identifying innovations and governance for their provision. Innovations identified in policies centre around value chains of wood and bioenergy or bio-iversity conservation, while non-wood forest products, cultural heritage, and recreation receive little attention. Bio-physical supply of provisioning ES is connected to policies emphasising many innovations, while little supply of regulating ES could trigger service innovations and several new governance mechanisms. As forest ecosystems have received much attention in global, European and national sustainability policies, our institutional mapping illustrates that there is room for more use of innovations in promoting ES provision.

引用

页数：11