Snowfall rate estimation using C-band polarimetric radars

被引:9
作者
Hassan, Diar [1 ]
Taylor, Peter A. [2 ]
Isaac, George A. [3 ]
机构
[1] York Univ, Dept Earth & Space Sci & Engn, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] York Univ, Ctr Res Earth & Space Sci, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Weather Impacts Consulting Inc, Barrie, ON, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
polarimetric radars; snowfall estimation; snow water equivalent estimation; radar quantitative precipitation estimation; WINTER PRECIPITATION; REFLECTIVITY MEASUREMENTS; RAINFALL ESTIMATION; NETWORK; ALGORITHM;
D O I
10.1002/met.1613
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
Radar quantitative precipitation estimation plays an important role in weather forecasting, nowcasting and hydrological models. This study evaluates the Sekhon and Srivastava (1970) snow water equivalent (SWE) algorithm currently implemented by the Canadian Radar Network of Environment and Climate Change Canada, suggests an improved algorithm and also evaluates the ability of polarimetric radars in estimating SWE. The radar data were collected from the dual polarimetric King City radar (CWKR) near Toronto, Ontario, and the Doppler Holyrood radar (CWTP) in Newfoundland. SWE data were collected at Oakville, Ontario, at Pearson International Airport (CYYZ), Toronto, Ontario, and at Mount Pearl, Newfoundland. The ground observations show that the polarimetric variables could be used to infer a few of the microphysical processes during snowfall. It is suggested that the co-polar correlation co-efficient ((hv)) could be sensitive to the size ranges of different snow habits. Also, higher differential reflectivity (Z(dr)) values were measured with large aggregates. The results show a severe underestimation of SWE rates by the Sekhon and Srivastava algorithm. One hour accumulations from each site were used to develop SWE(Z(eH)) and SWE(Z(eH), Z(DR)) algorithms (Z(eH) and Z(DR) are the reflectivity factor and differential reflectivity, respectively). Similarly, algorithms were developed using SWE at 10 min intervals from CYYZ and Mount Pearl but these algorithms appeared to overestimate SWE. The hourly SWE accumulations from the three sites were combined to produce an additional SWE(Z(eH)) algorithm which showed better statistical results. A modest difference was found between the conventional and polarimetric algorithms for estimating snowfall amounts (SWE).
引用
收藏
页码:142 / 156
页数:15
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [21] Joe P., 2002, 2nd European Conference on Radar Meteorology (ERAD), Delft, Netherlands, P370
  • [22] S-Band Dual-Polarization Radar Observations of Winter Storms
    Kennedy, Patrick C.
    Rutledge, Steven A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED METEOROLOGY AND CLIMATOLOGY, 2011, 50 (04) : 844 - 858
  • [23] Utilizing Spaceborne Radars to Retrieve Dry Snowfall
    Kulie, Mark S.
    Bennartz, Ralf
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED METEOROLOGY AND CLIMATOLOGY, 2009, 48 (12) : 2564 - 2580
  • [24] A Dual-Polarization Radar Signature of Hydrometeor Refreezing in Winter Storms
    Kumjian, Matthew R.
    Ryzhkov, Alexander V.
    Reeves, Heather D.
    Schuur, Terry J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED METEOROLOGY AND CLIMATOLOGY, 2013, 52 (11) : 2549 - 2566
  • [25] Assessing Snowfall Rates from X-Band Radar Reflectivity Measurements
    Matrosov, Sergey Y.
    Campbell, Carroll
    Kingsmill, David
    Sukovich, Ellen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ATMOSPHERIC AND OCEANIC TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 26 (11) : 2324 - 2339
  • [26] Matrosov SY, 1998, J APPL METEOROL, V37, P1510, DOI 10.1175/1520-0450(1998)037<1510:ADWRMT>2.0.CO
  • [27] 2
  • [28] Rasmussen R, 2003, J APPL METEOROL, V42, P20, DOI 10.1175/1520-0450(2003)042<0020:SNUART>2.0.CO
  • [29] 2
  • [30] HOW WELL ARE WE MEASURING SNOW? The NOAA/FAA/NCAR Winter Precipitation Test Bed
    Rasmussen, Roy
    Baker, Bruce
    Kochendorfer, John
    Meyers, Tilden
    Landolt, Scott
    Fischer, Alexandre P.
    Black, Jenny
    Theriault, Julie M.
    Kucera, Paul
    Gochis, David
    Smith, Craig
    Nitu, Rodica
    Hall, Mark
    Ikeda, Kyoko
    Gutmann, Ethan
    [J]. BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2012, 93 (06) : 811 - 829