Snowfall rate estimation using C-band polarimetric radars

被引:9
作者
Hassan, Diar [1 ]
Taylor, Peter A. [2 ]
Isaac, George A. [3 ]
机构
[1] York Univ, Dept Earth & Space Sci & Engn, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] York Univ, Ctr Res Earth & Space Sci, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Weather Impacts Consulting Inc, Barrie, ON, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
polarimetric radars; snowfall estimation; snow water equivalent estimation; radar quantitative precipitation estimation; WINTER PRECIPITATION; REFLECTIVITY MEASUREMENTS; RAINFALL ESTIMATION; NETWORK; ALGORITHM;
D O I
10.1002/met.1613
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
Radar quantitative precipitation estimation plays an important role in weather forecasting, nowcasting and hydrological models. This study evaluates the Sekhon and Srivastava (1970) snow water equivalent (SWE) algorithm currently implemented by the Canadian Radar Network of Environment and Climate Change Canada, suggests an improved algorithm and also evaluates the ability of polarimetric radars in estimating SWE. The radar data were collected from the dual polarimetric King City radar (CWKR) near Toronto, Ontario, and the Doppler Holyrood radar (CWTP) in Newfoundland. SWE data were collected at Oakville, Ontario, at Pearson International Airport (CYYZ), Toronto, Ontario, and at Mount Pearl, Newfoundland. The ground observations show that the polarimetric variables could be used to infer a few of the microphysical processes during snowfall. It is suggested that the co-polar correlation co-efficient ((hv)) could be sensitive to the size ranges of different snow habits. Also, higher differential reflectivity (Z(dr)) values were measured with large aggregates. The results show a severe underestimation of SWE rates by the Sekhon and Srivastava algorithm. One hour accumulations from each site were used to develop SWE(Z(eH)) and SWE(Z(eH), Z(DR)) algorithms (Z(eH) and Z(DR) are the reflectivity factor and differential reflectivity, respectively). Similarly, algorithms were developed using SWE at 10 min intervals from CYYZ and Mount Pearl but these algorithms appeared to overestimate SWE. The hourly SWE accumulations from the three sites were combined to produce an additional SWE(Z(eH)) algorithm which showed better statistical results. A modest difference was found between the conventional and polarimetric algorithms for estimating snowfall amounts (SWE).
引用
收藏
页码:142 / 156
页数:15
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [1] Andric J, 2010, P 13 C CLOUD PHYS 28, p[2, 89]
  • [2] Polarimetric Signatures above the Melting Layer in Winter Storms: An Observational and Modeling Study
    Andric, Jelena
    Kumjian, Matthew R.
    Zrnic, Dusan S.
    Straka, Jerry M.
    Melnikov, Valery M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED METEOROLOGY AND CLIMATOLOGY, 2013, 52 (03) : 682 - 700
  • [3] Baldini L, 2008, RAD C RADAR 08 26 30, DOI [10.1109/RADAR.2008.4721101., DOI 10.1109/RADAR.2008.4721101]
  • [4] Ice water content and precipitation rate as a function of equivalent radar reflectivity and temperature based on in situ observations
    Boudala, Faisal S.
    Isaac, George A.
    Hudak, David
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2006, 111 (D11)
  • [5] Rainfall Estimation with an Operational Polarimetric C-Band Radar in the United Kingdom: Comparison with a Gauge Network and Error Analysis
    Bringi, V. N.
    Rico-Ramirez, M. A.
    Thurai, M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROMETEOROLOGY, 2011, 12 (05) : 935 - 954
  • [6] Bringi VN, 2001, POLARIMETRIC DOPPLER, P179
  • [7] Carlson P. E., 1972, Journal of Applied Meteorology, V11, P494, DOI 10.1175/1520-0450(1972)011<0494:MOSBR>2.0.CO
  • [8] 2
  • [9] A Theory-Based Hydrometeor Identification Algorithm for X-Band Polarimetric Radars
    Dolan, Brenda
    Rutledge, Steven A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ATMOSPHERIC AND OCEANIC TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 26 (10) : 2071 - 2088
  • [10] FUJIYOSHI Y, 1990, J APPL METEOROL, V29, P147, DOI 10.1175/1520-0450(1990)029<0147:DOARFS>2.0.CO