A stop too far: How does public transportation concentration influence neighbourhood median household income?

被引:29
作者
Barton, Michael S. [1 ]
Gibbons, Joseph [2 ]
机构
[1] Louisiana State Univ, Baton Rouge, LA 70803 USA
[2] San Diego State Univ, San Diego, CA 92182 USA
关键词
exploratory spatial data analysis; income inequality; neighbourhood; New York City; public transit; random effects regression; transport; SPATIAL ASSIMILATION; PROPERTY-VALUES; NEW-YORK; TRANSIT; SEGREGATION; POVERTY; ACCESS; IMPACT; US; GENTRIFICATION;
D O I
10.1177/0042098015593462
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Research on US cities has connected the concentration of public transit with various neighbourhood outcomes, but it remains unclear whether public transit was more attractive to lower or higher income households. Some research found neighbourhoods with public transportation were more attractive to lower income households, likely because such households could not afford private transportation. Closer examination suggested that the type of transit was important, as lower income households were more likely to use buses while higher income households were more likely to use rapid transit. A key limitation of existing research on transit and neighbourhood household income was that it did not adequately control for variation over time. The current study addresses this limitation by assessing how the concentration of subway and bus stops predicted variation in median household income in New York City during the 2000s. Results of cross - sectional regressions partially confirm the findings of previous research that lower income households corresponded to areas characterised by higher concentrations of bus stops. Longitudinal results, however, indicate that the concentration of different forms of transit was uniquely associated with changes in neighbourhood median household income, independent of other neighbourhood changes.
引用
收藏
页码:538 / 554
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   VARIATIONS ON 2 THEMES - RACIAL AND ETHNIC PATTERNS IN THE ATTAINMENT OF SUBURBAN RESIDENCE [J].
ALBA, RD ;
LOGAN, JR .
DEMOGRAPHY, 1991, 28 (03) :431-453
[2]   Immigrant groups in the suburbs: A reexamination of suburbanization and spatial assimilation [J].
Alba, RD ;
Logan, JR ;
Stults, BJ ;
Marzan, G ;
Zhang, WQ .
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1999, 64 (03) :446-460
[3]  
Allison Paul., 2005, FIXED EFFECTS REGRES
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2005, WHO LIVES DOWNTOWN
[5]   LOCAL INDICATORS OF SPATIAL ASSOCIATION - LISA [J].
ANSELIN, L .
GEOGRAPHICAL ANALYSIS, 1995, 27 (02) :93-115
[6]  
Apparicio P., 2013, Geo -Segregation Analyzer: a multiplaform application (version 1.1)
[7]   Urban rail systems: analysis of the factors behind success [J].
Babalik-Sutcliffe, E .
TRANSPORT REVIEWS, 2002, 22 (04) :415-447
[8]  
Baum-Snow N., 2005, BROOKINGS WHARTON PA, V6, P147
[9]   Identifying the impacts of rail transit stations on residential property values [J].
Bowes, DR ;
Ihlanfeldt, KR .
JOURNAL OF URBAN ECONOMICS, 2001, 50 (01) :1-25
[10]   GENTRIFICATION AND NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING CYCLES: WILL AMERICA'S FUTURE DOWNTOWNS BE RICH? [J].
Brueckner, Jan K. ;
Rosenthal, Stuart S. .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 2009, 91 (04) :725-743