What do territory owners defend against?

被引:35
作者
Hinsch, Martin [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Komdeur, Jan [3 ]
机构
[1] John Innes Ctr, Computat & Syst Biol, Norwich Res Pk, Norwich NR4 7UH, Norfolk, England
[2] Univ Groningen, TRES, NL-9747 AG Groningen, Netherlands
[3] Univ Groningen, GELIFES, NL-9747 AG Groningen, Netherlands
关键词
territoriality; territory defence; resource defence; property; ownership; FEEDING TERRITORIALITY; SEQUENTIAL-ARRIVALS; MECHANISTIC MODELS; PIED WAGTAIL; GAME-THEORY; EVOLUTION; SIZE; POPULATION; BEHAVIOR; CONSEQUENCES;
D O I
10.1098/rspb.2016.2356
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Theoretical research on evolutionary aspects of territoriality has a long history. Existing studies, however, differ widely in modelling approach and research question. A generalized view on the evolution of territoriality is accordingly still missing. In this review, we show that territorial conflicts can be classified into qualitatively distinct types according to what mode of access to a territory which competitor attempts to gain. We argue that many of the inconsistencies between existing studies can be traced back to the fact that, while using the same terminology, different instances of these types of conflicts have been investigated. We discuss the connections of each type of conflict to existing research within the wider area of animal conflicts. We conclude that a clear conceptual separation of different types of territorial conflicts is helpful but that a more general theory of territoriality has to account for interdependencies between them and that a more mechanistic approach to modelling territoriality is needed.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 114 条
[1]   Approaches to the study of territory size and shape [J].
Adams, ES .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ECOLOGY AND SYSTEMATICS, 2001, 32 :277-303
[2]   Mechanisms of population regulation in the fire ant Solenopsis invicta:: an experimental study [J].
Adams, ES ;
Tschinkel, WR .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL ECOLOGY, 2001, 70 (03) :355-369
[3]   Optimization, conflict, and nonoverlapping foraging ranges in ants [J].
Adler, FR ;
Gordon, DM .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 2003, 162 (05) :529-543
[4]   Uncertainty in territory quality affects the benefits of usurpation in a Mediterranean wrasse [J].
Alonzo, SH .
BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY, 2004, 15 (02) :278-285
[5]   SOCIAL STABILITY AND TERRITORY ACQUISITION IN BIRDS [J].
BELETSKY, LD .
BEHAVIOUR, 1992, 123 :290-313
[6]   The elusive paradox: owner-intruder roles, strategies, and outcomes in parasitoid contests [J].
Bentley, Tom ;
Hull, Tristan T. ;
Hardy, Ian C. W. ;
Goubault, Marlene .
BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY, 2009, 20 (02) :296-304
[7]   Bargaining in biology? [J].
Binmore, K. .
JOURNAL OF EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY, 2010, 23 (07) :1351-1363
[8]   Assessment and decision making in animals: A mechanistic model underlying behavioural flexibility can prevent ambiguity [J].
Blumstein, DT ;
Bouskila, A .
OIKOS, 1996, 77 (03) :569-576
[9]   Are there general mechanisms of animal home range behaviour?: A review and prospects for future research [J].
Boerger, Luca ;
Dalziel, Benjamin D. ;
Fryxell, John M. .
ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2008, 11 (06) :637-650
[10]   Density dependence, territoriality, and divisibility of resources: From optimality models to population processes [J].
Both, C ;
Visser, ME .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 2003, 161 (02) :326-336