The OMC - a deliberative-democratic mode of governance? The cases of employment and pensions

被引:66
作者
de la Porte, C
Nanz, P
机构
[1] European Univ Inst, I-50016 Fiesole, FI, Italy
[2] Univ Bremen, Grad Sch Social Sci, D-28334 Bremen, Germany
关键词
deliberative democracy; employment; learning; open method of co-ordination (OMC); participation; pensions; public debate; transparency;
D O I
10.1080/1350176042000194430
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
The open method of co-ordination's (OMCs) emphasis on transparency, democratic participation and learning has led to a particular interest in this governance mechanism from the perspective of deliberative democracy. This article analyses the 'democratic' dimension of the OMC from a normative and an empirical perspective. We first present relevant theories of deliberative democracy, from which we derive a list of normative criteria, which we then use to explore the democratic quality of the OMC in the areas of employment and pensions. The empirical analysis reveals that there are important differences in the democratic quality of the OMC between these two areas, but that, ultimately, the OMC (as yet) does not live up to its own democratic ambitions.
引用
收藏
页码:267 / 288
页数:22
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2003, Governing Work and Welfare in a New Economy
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2002, The New Knowledge Economy in Europe
  • [3] [Anonymous], GOVERNING WORK WELFA
  • [4] [Anonymous], GOVERNING WORK WELFA
  • [5] European briefing - Digest
    Barbier, C
    de la Porte, C
    Baeten, R
    Ghailani, D
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN SOCIAL POLICY, 2002, 12 (04) : 347 - 357
  • [6] BARBIER C, 2003, TOMORROW EUROPE JUL
  • [7] BARBIER JC, 2001, STRATEGIC EUROPEENNE
  • [8] The open method of co-ordination and new governance patterns in the EU
    Borrás, S
    Jacobsson, K
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN PUBLIC POLICY, 2004, 11 (02) : 185 - 208
  • [9] BUECHS M, 2004, IN PRESS OPENING OPE
  • [10] *CEC, 2002, 416 COM CEC