Routines and transactive memory systems: Creating, coordinating, retaining, and transferring knowledge in organizations

被引:57
作者
Argote, Linda [1 ]
Guo, Jerry M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Tepper Sch Business, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
来源
RESEARCH IN ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR: AN ANNUAL SERIES OF ANALYTICAL ESSAYS AND CRITICAL REVIEWS, VOL 36 | 2016年 / 36卷
基金
美国安德鲁·梅隆基金会;
关键词
Routines; Transactive memory systems; Organizational learning; Knowledge transfer; INPUT UNCERTAINTY; SOCIAL IDENTITY; WORK GROUPS; PERFORMANCE; CAPABILITIES; INFORMATION; EXPERTISE; COGNITION; BENEFITS; INERTIA;
D O I
10.1016/j.riob.2016.10.002
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
This chapter compares and contrasts the effects of two knowledge repositories, routines and transactive memory systems (TMSs), on knowledge creation, coordination, retention and transfer. We provide overviews of research on the two knowledge repositories, with particular attention to how they form and change. We then discuss the relationship between routines and TMSs. We also compare and contrast routines and TMSs in terms of their capabilities to promote knowledge creation, coordination, retention and transfer in organizations. Routines can transfer across organizations, and they are resilient to member turnover. Although routines can be a source of inertia, they can also enable change. TMSs are susceptible to member turnover and are not easily transferred to other organizations. TMSs promote innovation and are particularly valuable under conditions of uncertainty. We argue that TMSs and routines are reciprocally related. Routines can seed TMSs and TMSs can crystalize into routines. We hope that our chapter stimulates future research on the interrelationship between routines and TMSs and their effects on knowledge creation, coordination, retention, and transfer in organizations. (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:65 / 84
页数:20
相关论文
共 137 条
[1]   Flexibility versus efficiency? A case study of model changeovers in the Toyota production system [J].
Adler, PS ;
Goldoftas, B ;
Levine, DI .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 1999, 10 (01) :43-68
[2]   Does Organizational Forgetting Affect Vendor Quality Performance? An Empirical Investigation [J].
Agrawal, Anupam ;
Muthulingam, Suresh .
M&SOM-MANUFACTURING & SERVICE OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2015, 17 (03) :350-367
[3]   THE ROUTINE MAY BE STABLE BUT THE ADVANTAGE IS NOT: COMPETITIVE IMPLICATIONS OF KEY EMPLOYEE MOBILITY [J].
Aime, Federico ;
Johnson, Scott ;
Ridge, Jason W. ;
Hill, Aaron D. .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2010, 31 (01) :75-87
[4]   Transactive memory system in new product development teams [J].
Akgün, AE ;
Byrne, JC ;
Keskin, H ;
Lynn, GS .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 2006, 53 (01) :95-111
[5]   Knowledge networks in new product development projects:: A transactive memory perspective [J].
Akgün, AE ;
Byrne, J ;
Keskin, H ;
Lynn, GS ;
Imamoglu, SZ .
INFORMATION & MANAGEMENT, 2005, 42 (08) :1105-1120
[6]   Decay, Shock, and Renewal: Operational Routines and Process Entropy in the Pharmaceutical Industry [J].
Anand, Gopesh ;
Gray, John ;
Siemsen, Enno .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2012, 23 (06) :1700-1716
[7]  
[Anonymous], SHARED COGNITION ORG
[8]  
[Anonymous], J EXPT SOCIAL PSYCHO
[9]  
[Anonymous], 1994, The management of innovation
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2013, ORG LEARNING CREATIN