Greatest Challenges of Rectal Cancer Survivors: Results of a Population-Based Survey

被引:46
|
作者
McMullen, Carmit K. [1 ]
Bulkley, Joanna E. [1 ]
Altschuler, Andrea [2 ]
Wendel, Christopher S. [3 ,4 ]
Grant, Marcia [5 ]
Hornbrook, Mark C. [1 ]
Sun, Virginia [5 ]
Krouse, Robert S. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Ctr Hlth Res, 3800 N Interstate Ave, Portland, OR 97227 USA
[2] Kaiser Permanente, Med Care Program, Div Res, Oakland, CA USA
[3] Southern Arizona Vet Affairs Hlth Care Syst, Tucson, AZ USA
[4] Univ Arizona, Coll Med, Tucson, AZ USA
[5] City Hope Natl Med Ctr, Dept Populat Sci, Div Nursing Res & Educ, Duarte, CA USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Patient-centered outcomes; Rectal cancer; Survey; Survivors; Unmet needs; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; COLORECTAL-CANCER; ANTERIOR RESECTION; ABDOMINOPERINEAL RESECTION; BOWEL FUNCTION; SOCIETY; QUESTIONNAIRE; SURGERY; STOMA; NEEDS;
D O I
10.1097/DCR.0000000000000695
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: Eliciting the priorities of cancer survivors is essential to address the specific needs of cancer survivor subgroups. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to describe the greatest challenges related to treatment for long-term rectal cancer survivors. DESIGN: This was an observational study with a cross-sectional survey. SETTINGS: The study included members of Kaiser Permanente Northern California and Northwest health plans. PATIENTS: A survey was mailed to long-term (>= 5 years postdiagnosis) survivors of rectal cancer who had an anastomosis, temporary ostomy, or permanent ostomy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome was measured with an open-ended question about the greatest challenge related to cancer surgery. We categorized responses using a grounded theory approach with double coding for reliability. Bonferroni-adjusted chi(2) values were used to assess differences in the proportions of subgroups who mentioned challenges within each response category. RESULTS: The survey completion rate was 61% (577/953); 76% (440/577) of participants responded to the greatest challenge question. The greatest challenges for respondents were bowel/ostomy management (reported by 44%), negative psychosocial effects (37%), late effects of treatment (21%), comorbidities and aging (13%), postoperative recovery (5%), and negative healthcare experiences (5%). Survivors with temporary ostomy or anastomosis were more likely than survivors with permanent ostomy to report late effects (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.01). Survivors with anastomosis were less likely than survivors with permanent ostomy to report negative psychosocial impacts (p = 0.0001). LIMITATIONS: Generalizability is restricted by the lack of ethnically and racially diverse, uninsured (non-Medicare-eligible population), and non-English-speaking participants. Because the survey was cross-sectional and included respondents at different times since diagnosis, we could not adequately address changes in the greatest challenges over time. CONCLUSIONS: Our results reveal the need for bowel/ostomy management, psychosocial services, and surveillance for late effects in survivorship and supportive care services for all survivors of rectal cancer, regardless of ostomy status. The perspective of long-term survivors with anastomosis reveals challenges that may not be anticipated during decision making for treatment (see Video, Supplemental Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/DCR/A254).
引用
收藏
页码:1019 / 1027
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Life with a stoma after curative resection for rectal cancer: a population-based cross-sectional study
    Feddern, M. -L.
    Emmertsen, K. J.
    Laurberg, S.
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2015, 17 (11) : 1011 - 1017
  • [12] Health behaviors of cancer survivors: data from an Australian population-based survey
    Elizabeth G. Eakin
    Danny R. Youlden
    Peter D. Baade
    Sheleigh P. Lawler
    Marina M. Reeves
    Jane S. Heyworth
    Lin Fritschi
    Cancer Causes & Control, 2007, 18 : 881 - 894
  • [13] Health behaviors of cancer survivors: data from an Australian population-based survey
    Eakin, Elizabeth G.
    Youlden, Danny R.
    Baade, Peter D.
    Lawler, Sheleigh P.
    Reeves, Marina M.
    Heyworth, Jane S.
    Fritschi, Lin
    CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL, 2007, 18 (08) : 881 - 894
  • [14] Risk factors of rectal cancer local recurrence: population-based survey and validation of the Swedish rectal cancer registry
    Jorgren, F.
    Johansson, R.
    Damber, L.
    Lindmark, G.
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2010, 12 (10) : 977 - 986
  • [15] Factors Influencing Local Failure in Rectal Cancer: Analysis of 2315 Patients From a Population-Based Series
    Syk, E.
    Glimelius, B.
    Nilsson, P. J.
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2010, 53 (05) : 744 - 752
  • [16] Cancer site differences in the health-related quality of life of Korean cancer survivors: Results from a Population-based Survey
    Ryu, Mikyung
    Hwang, Jee-In
    PUBLIC HEALTH NURSING, 2019, 36 (02) : 144 - 154
  • [17] Hartmann’s procedure in rectal cancer: a population-based study of postoperative complications
    Ingvar Sverrisson
    Maziar Nikberg
    Abbas Chabok
    Kenneth Smedh
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 2015, 30 : 181 - 186
  • [18] The importance of rectal washout for the oncological outcome after Hartmann's procedure for rectal cancer: analysis of population-based data from the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry
    Jorgren, F.
    Johansson, R.
    Arnadottir, H.
    Lindmark, G.
    TECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2017, 21 (05) : 373 - 381
  • [19] A population-based survey to assess the association between cannabis and quality of life among colorectal cancer survivors
    Susan L. Calcaterra
    Andrea N. Burnett-Hartman
    J. David Powers
    Douglas A. Corley
    Carmit M. McMullen
    Pamala A. Pawloski
    Heather Spencer Feigelson
    BMC Cancer, 20
  • [20] A population-based survey to assess the association between cannabis and quality of life among colorectal cancer survivors
    Calcaterra, Susan L.
    Burnett-Hartman, Andrea N.
    Powers, J. David
    Corley, Douglas A.
    McMullen, Carmit M.
    Pawloski, Pamala A.
    Feigelson, Heather Spencer
    BMC CANCER, 2020, 20 (01)