Prediction of N-Methyl-D-Aspartate Receptor GluN1-Ligand Binding Affinity by a Novel SVM-Pose/SVM-Score Combinatorial Ensemble Docking Scheme

被引:23
作者
Leong, Max K. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Syu, Ren-Guei [1 ]
Ding, Yi-Lung [1 ]
Weng, Ching-Feng [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Natl Dong Hwa Univ, Dept Chem, Hualien 97401, Taiwan
[2] Natl Dong Hwa Univ, Dept Life Sci, Hualien 97401, Taiwan
[3] Natl Dong Hwa Univ, Inst Biotechnol, Hualien 97401, Taiwan
关键词
PROTEIN-LIGAND INTERACTIONS; NMDA RECEPTOR; MOLECULAR DOCKING; CONFORMATIONAL-ANALYSIS; SUBUNIT ARRANGEMENT; CRYSTAL-STRUCTURE; ANTAGONISTS; VALIDATION; DISCOVERY; RECOGNITION;
D O I
10.1038/srep40053
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The glycine-binding site of the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) subunit GluN1 is a potential pharmacological target for neurodegenerative disorders. A novel combinatorial ensemble docking scheme using ligand and protein conformation ensembles and customized support vector machine (SVM)-based models to select the docked pose and to predict the docking score was generated for predicting the NMDAR GluN1-ligand binding affinity. The predicted root mean square deviation (RMSD) values in pose by SVM-Pose models were found to be in good agreement with the observed values (n = 30, r(2) = 0.928-0.988, q(CV)(2) = 0.894-0.954, RMSE = 0.002-0.412, s = 0.001-0.214), and the predicted pKi values by SVM-Score were found to be in good agreement with the observed values for the training samples (n = 24, r(2) = 0.967, q(CV)(2) = 0.899, RMSE = 0.295, s = 0.170) and test samples (n = 13, q(2) = 0.894, RMSE = 0.437, s = 0.202). When subjected to various statistical validations, the developed SVM-Pose and SVM-Score models consistently met the most stringent criteria. A mock test asserted the predictivity of this novel docking scheme. Collectively, this accurate novel combinatorial ensemble docking scheme can be used to predict the NMDAR GluN1-ligand binding affinity for facilitating drug discovery.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 117 条
[1]   Tailored scoring function of Trypsin-benzamidine complex using COMBINE descriptors and support vector regression [J].
Arakawa, Masamoto ;
Hasegawa, Kiyoshi ;
Funatsu, Kimito .
CHEMOMETRICS AND INTELLIGENT LABORATORY SYSTEMS, 2008, 92 (02) :145-151
[2]  
Ashtawy H., 2013, LECT NOTES COMPUTER, V7875, P298
[3]   BgN-Score and BsN-Score: Bagging and boosting based ensemble neural networks scoring functions for accurate binding affinity prediction of protein-ligand complexes [J].
Ashtawy, Hossam M. ;
Mahapatra, Nihar R. .
BMC BIOINFORMATICS, 2015, 16
[4]   Subunit-specific roles of glycine-binding domains in activation of NR1/NR3 N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors [J].
Awobuluyi, Marc ;
Yang, Jin ;
Ye, Yuzhen ;
Chatterton, Jon E. ;
Godzik, Adam ;
Lipton, Stuart A. ;
Zhang, Dongxian .
MOLECULAR PHARMACOLOGY, 2007, 71 (01) :112-122
[5]   In Silico Predictions of Human Skin Permeability using Nonlinear Quantitative Structure-Property Relationship Models [J].
Baba, Hiromi ;
Takahara, Jun-ichi ;
Mamitsuka, Hiroshi .
PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH, 2015, 32 (07) :2360-2371
[6]   Tandem 3D-QSARs approach as a valuable tool to predict binding affinity data: Design of new Gly/NMDA receptor antagonists as a key study [J].
Bacilieri, M. ;
Varano, F. ;
Deflorian, F. ;
Marini, M. ;
Catarzi, D. ;
Colotta, V. ;
Filacchioni, G. ;
Galli, A. ;
Costagli, C. ;
Kaseda, C. ;
Moro, S. .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND MODELING, 2007, 47 (05) :1913-1922
[7]   SeleX-CS: A New Consensus Scoring Algorithm for Hit Discovery and Lead Optimization [J].
Bar-Haim, Shay ;
Aharon, Ayelet ;
Ben-Moshe, Tal ;
Marantz, Yael ;
Senderowitz, Hanoch .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND MODELING, 2009, 49 (03) :623-633
[8]  
Baron BM, 1996, J PHARMACOL EXP THER, V279, P62
[9]   GFscore:: A general nonlinear consensus scoring function for high-throughput docking [J].
Betzi, Stephane ;
Suhre, Karsten ;
Chetrit, Bernard ;
Guerlesquin, Francoise ;
Morelli, Xavier .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND MODELING, 2006, 46 (04) :1704-1712
[10]   Protein-based virtual screening of chemical databases. 1. Evaluation of different docking/scoring combinations [J].
Bissantz, C ;
Folkers, G ;
Rognan, D .
JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 2000, 43 (25) :4759-4767