Standards-Based Clinical Decision Support Platform to Manage Patients Who Meet Guideline-Based Criteria for Genetic Evaluation of Familial Cancer

被引:31
作者
Del Fiol, Guilherme [1 ]
Kohlmann, Wendy [2 ]
Bradshaw, Richard L. [1 ]
Weir, Charlene R. [1 ]
Flynn, Michael [3 ]
Hess, Rachel [3 ,4 ]
Schiffman, Joshua D. [2 ,5 ]
Nanjo, Claude [1 ]
Kawamoto, Kensaku [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utah, Dept Biomed Informat, 421 Wakara Way,Ste 208, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
[2] Univ Utah, Huntsman Canc Inst, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[3] Univ Utah, Dept Internal Med, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
[4] Univ Utah, Dept Populat Hlth Sci, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[5] Univ Utah, Dept Pediat, Salt Lake City, UT USA
来源
JCO CLINICAL CANCER INFORMATICS | 2020年 / 4卷
关键词
D O I
10.1200/CCI.19.00120
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
PURPOSE The ubiquitous adoption of electronic health records (EHRs) with family health history (FHH) data provides opportunities for tailoring cancer screening strategies to individuals. We aimed to enable a standards-based clinical decision support (CDS) platform for identifying and managing patients who meet guidelines for genetic evaluation of hereditary cancer. METHODS The CDS platform (www.opencds.org) was used to implement algorithms based on the 2018 National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines for genetic evaluation of hereditary breast/ovarian and colorectal cancer. The platform was designed to be interfaced with different EHR systems via the Health Level Seven International Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources standard. The platform was integrated with the Epic EHR and evaluated in a pilot study at an academic health care system. RESULTS The CDS platform was executed against a target population of 143,012 patients; 5,245 (3.7%) met criteria for genetic evaluation based on the FHH recorded in the EHR. In a clinical pilot study, genetic counselors attempted to reach out to 71 of the patients. Of those patients, 25 (35%) scheduled an appointment, 10 (14%) declined, 2 (3%) did not need genetic counseling, 7 (10%) said they would consider it in the future, and 27 (38%) were unreachable. To date, 13 (52%) of the scheduled patients completed visits, and 2 (15%) of those were found to have pathogenic variants in cancer predisposition genes. CONCLUSION A standards-based CDS platform integrated with EHR systems is a promising population-based approach to identify patients who are appropriate candidates for genetic evaluation of hereditary cancers. (c) 2020 by American Society of Clinical Oncology
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 9
页数:9
相关论文
共 35 条
[31]   Screening Mammography in Older Women A Review [J].
Walter, Louise C. ;
Schonberg, Mara A. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2014, 311 (13) :1336-1347
[32]   Breast Density and Breast Cancer Risk: A Practical Review [J].
Wang, Amy T. ;
Vachon, Celine M. ;
Brandt, Kathleen R. ;
Ghosh, Karthik .
MAYO CLINIC PROCEEDINGS, 2014, 89 (04) :548-557
[33]   Review and Comparison of Electronic Patient-Facing Family Health History Tools [J].
Welch, Brandon M. ;
Wiley, Kevin ;
Pflieger, Lance ;
Achiangia, Rosaline ;
Baker, Karen ;
Hughes-Halbert, Chanita ;
Morrison, Heath ;
Schiffman, Joshua ;
Doerr, Megan .
JOURNAL OF GENETIC COUNSELING, 2018, 27 (02) :381-391
[34]   Cluster randomized trial of a multifaceted primary care decision-support intervention for inherited breast cancer risk [J].
Wilson, Brenda J. ;
Torrance, Nicola ;
Mollison, Jill ;
Watson, M. Stuart ;
Douglas, Alison ;
Miedzybrodzka, Zosia ;
Gordon, Richard ;
Wordsworth, Sarah ;
Campbell, Marion ;
Haites, Neva ;
Grant, Adrian .
FAMILY PRACTICE, 2006, 23 (05) :537-544
[35]   Primary care: Is there enough time for prevention? [J].
Yarnall, KSH ;
Pollak, KI ;
Ostbye, T ;
Krause, KM ;
Michener, JL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2003, 93 (04) :635-641