Standards-Based Clinical Decision Support Platform to Manage Patients Who Meet Guideline-Based Criteria for Genetic Evaluation of Familial Cancer

被引:31
作者
Del Fiol, Guilherme [1 ]
Kohlmann, Wendy [2 ]
Bradshaw, Richard L. [1 ]
Weir, Charlene R. [1 ]
Flynn, Michael [3 ]
Hess, Rachel [3 ,4 ]
Schiffman, Joshua D. [2 ,5 ]
Nanjo, Claude [1 ]
Kawamoto, Kensaku [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utah, Dept Biomed Informat, 421 Wakara Way,Ste 208, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
[2] Univ Utah, Huntsman Canc Inst, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[3] Univ Utah, Dept Internal Med, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
[4] Univ Utah, Dept Populat Hlth Sci, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[5] Univ Utah, Dept Pediat, Salt Lake City, UT USA
来源
JCO CLINICAL CANCER INFORMATICS | 2020年 / 4卷
关键词
D O I
10.1200/CCI.19.00120
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
PURPOSE The ubiquitous adoption of electronic health records (EHRs) with family health history (FHH) data provides opportunities for tailoring cancer screening strategies to individuals. We aimed to enable a standards-based clinical decision support (CDS) platform for identifying and managing patients who meet guidelines for genetic evaluation of hereditary cancer. METHODS The CDS platform (www.opencds.org) was used to implement algorithms based on the 2018 National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines for genetic evaluation of hereditary breast/ovarian and colorectal cancer. The platform was designed to be interfaced with different EHR systems via the Health Level Seven International Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources standard. The platform was integrated with the Epic EHR and evaluated in a pilot study at an academic health care system. RESULTS The CDS platform was executed against a target population of 143,012 patients; 5,245 (3.7%) met criteria for genetic evaluation based on the FHH recorded in the EHR. In a clinical pilot study, genetic counselors attempted to reach out to 71 of the patients. Of those patients, 25 (35%) scheduled an appointment, 10 (14%) declined, 2 (3%) did not need genetic counseling, 7 (10%) said they would consider it in the future, and 27 (38%) were unreachable. To date, 13 (52%) of the scheduled patients completed visits, and 2 (15%) of those were found to have pathogenic variants in cancer predisposition genes. CONCLUSION A standards-based CDS platform integrated with EHR systems is a promising population-based approach to identify patients who are appropriate candidates for genetic evaluation of hereditary cancers. (c) 2020 by American Society of Clinical Oncology
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 9
页数:9
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2015, Clinical practice guidelines in oncology - breast cancer screening and diagnosis
  • [2] Management of women at high risk of breast cancer
    Armstrong, Anne C.
    Evans, Gareth D.
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2014, 348
  • [3] 3 STRATEGIES TO PROMOTE CANCER SCREENING - HOW FEASIBLE IS WIDE-SCALE IMPLEMENTATION
    BIRD, JA
    MCPHEE, SJ
    JENKINS, C
    FORDHAM, D
    [J]. MEDICAL CARE, 1990, 28 (11) : 1005 - 1012
  • [4] Effect of Clinical Decision-Support Systems A Systematic Review
    Bright, Tiffani J.
    Wong, Anthony
    Dhurjati, Ravi
    Bristow, Erin
    Bastian, Lori
    Coeytaux, Remy R.
    Samsa, Gregory
    Hasselblad, Vic
    Williams, John W.
    Musty, Michael D.
    Wing, Liz
    Kendrick, Amy S.
    Sanders, Gillian D.
    Lobach, David
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2012, 157 (01) : 29 - U77
  • [5] Time and feasibility of prevention in primary care
    Bucher, Sophie
    Maury, Arnaud
    Rosso, Julie
    de Chanaud, Nicolas
    Bloy, Geraldine
    Pendola-Luchel, Isabelle
    Delpech, Raphaelle
    Paquet, Sylvain
    Falcoff, Hector
    Ringa, Virginie
    Rigal, Laurent
    [J]. FAMILY PRACTICE, 2017, 34 (01) : 49 - 56
  • [6] Burack RC, 1998, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V82, P2391, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19980615)82:12<2391::AID-CNCR13>3.0.CO
  • [7] 2-K
  • [8] Guidelines for colorectal cancer screening and surveillance in moderate and high risk groups (update from 2002)
    Cairns, Stuart R.
    Scholefield, John H.
    Steele, Robert J.
    Dunlop, Malcolm G.
    Thomas, Huw J. W.
    Evans, Gareth D.
    Eaden, Jayne A.
    Rutter, Matthew D.
    Atkin, Wendy P.
    Saunders, Brian P.
    Lucassen, Anneke
    Jenkins, Paul
    Fairclough, Peter D.
    Woodhouse, Christopher R. J.
    [J]. GUT, 2010, 59 (05) : 666 - 689
  • [9] Family history: Still relevant in the genomics era
    Doerr, Megan
    Teng, Kathryn
    [J]. CLEVELAND CLINIC JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2012, 79 (05) : 331 - 336
  • [10] Beyond Mammography: New Frontiers in Breast Cancer Screening
    Drukteinis, Jennifer S.
    Mooney, Blaise P.
    Flowers, Chris I.
    Gatenby, Robert A.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2013, 126 (06) : 472 - 479