A two-stage fuzzy approach for Industry 4.0 project portfolio selection within criteria and project interdependencies context

被引:18
作者
Keskin, Fatma Demircan [1 ]
机构
[1] Ege Univ, Fac Econ & Business Adm, Dept Quantitat Methods, TR-35100 Izmir, Turkey
关键词
analytic network process; fuzzy analytic network process; fuzzy multi-objective nonlinear programming; Industry; 4; 0; project portfolio selection; ANALYTIC NETWORK PROCESS; MANAGEMENT; TOPSIS; ANP;
D O I
10.1002/mcda.1691
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Industry 4.0, the new vision of our age has forced companies to transform their processes. In the process of transition to Industry 4.0, one of the most crucial success factors is to select the project portfolio that best fits their objectives. The uncertainty included in the projects, the interproject priority, and various interdependence relations, interactions between project evaluation criteria, decision makers with different perspectives, and preferences make Industry 4.0 project portfolio selection decision considerably complicated. In this study, a two-stage fuzzy approach is proposed to address this complex problem. In the first stage of the approach, the main criteria and subcriteria to be used in evaluating the Industry 4.0 projects have been determined based on the literature review and expert opinions. Following this, a network structure representing outer and inner dependencies has been formed, and the priority weights of the criteria have been obtained by taking into consideration these dependencies. Then, each of the project alternatives has been evaluated under subcriteria, and desirability indexes of project alternatives have been calculated. Fuzzy analytic network process has been applied in this stage. In the second stage, fuzzy multi-objective nonlinear programming has been used to select a project portfolio. In the application of the first stage of the proposed methodology, experts from three firms, which have made significant progress in the Industry 4.0 implementation process, are the decision makers. In the application of the second stage, hypothetically created project alternatives and their dataset have been used.
引用
收藏
页码:65 / 83
页数:19
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   Project selection for oil-fields development by using the AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods [J].
Amiri, Morteza Pakdin .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2010, 37 (09) :6218-6224
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2003, ADV PROJECT PORTFOLI
[3]  
Archer N. P., 1999, International Journal of Project Management, V17, P207, DOI 10.1016/S0263-7863(98)00032-5
[4]   A hybrid approach to concept selection through fuzzy analytic network process [J].
Ayag, Z. ;
Ozdemir, R. G. .
COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2009, 56 (01) :368-379
[5]  
Bert De Reyck, 2005, International Journal of Project Management, V23, P524, DOI 10.1016/j.ijproman.2005.02.003
[6]   Fuzzy R&D portfolio selection of interdependent projects [J].
Bhattacharyya, Rupak ;
Kumar, Pankaj ;
Kar, Samarjit .
COMPUTERS & MATHEMATICS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2011, 62 (10) :3857-3870
[7]   A novel hybrid MCDM approach based on fuzzy DEMATEL, fuzzy ANP and fuzzy TOPSIS to evaluate green suppliers [J].
Buyukozkan, Gulcin ;
Cifci, Gizem .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2012, 39 (03) :3000-3011
[8]  
Cachada A, 2017, IEEE IND ELEC, P3492, DOI 10.1109/IECON.2017.8216591
[9]   Information system project selection using fuzzy logic [J].
Chen, KC ;
Gorla, N .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS PART A-SYSTEMS AND HUMANS, 1998, 28 (06) :849-855
[10]   Analytic network process applied to project selection [J].
Cheng, EWL ;
Li, H .
JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2005, 131 (04) :459-466