Do Street Robbery Location Choices Vary Over Time of Day or Day of Week? A Test in Chicago

被引:84
作者
Bernasco, Wim [1 ,2 ]
Ruiter, Stijn [1 ,3 ]
Block, Richard [4 ]
机构
[1] Netherlands Inst Study Crime & Law Enforcement NS, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Dept Spatial Econ, De Boelelaan 1105, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Univ Utrecht, Dept Sociol, Utrecht, Netherlands
[4] Loyola Univ Chicago, Dept Sociol, Chicago, IL USA
关键词
street robbery; location choice; time of day; day of week; Chicago; RESIDENTIAL HISTORY; TARGET SELECTION; CRIME; MODEL; BURGLARY; AREAS;
D O I
10.1177/0022427816680681
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
Objectives: This article examines the hypothesis that in street robbery location choices, the importance of location attributes is conditional on the time of day and on the day of the week. Method: The hypothesis is assessed by estimating and comparing separate discrete location choice models for each two-hour time block of the day and for each day of the week. The spatial units of analysis are census blocks. Their relevant attributes include presence of various legal and illegal cash economies, presence of high schools, measures of accessibility, and distance from the offender's home. Results: The hypothesis is strongly rejected because for almost all census block attributes, their importance hardly depends on time of day or day of week. Only the effect of high schools in census blocks follows expectations, as its effect is only demonstrated at the times and on the days that schools are open. Conclusions: The results suggest that street robbers' location choices are not as strongly driven by spatial variations in immediate opportunities as has been suggested in previous studies. Rather, street robbers seem to perpetrate in the environs of cash economies and transit hubs most of the time irrespective of how many potential victims are around.
引用
收藏
页码:244 / 275
页数:32
相关论文
共 46 条
[21]   Daylight and darkness targeting strategies and the risks of being seen at residential burglaries [J].
Coupe, Timothy ;
Blake, Laurence .
CRIMINOLOGY, 2006, 44 (02) :431-464
[22]  
Duncombe W., 2001, INT J POPULATION GEO, V7, P281, DOI DOI 10.1002/IJPG.227
[23]   SAMPLING AND AGGREGATION ISSUES IN RANDOM UTILITY MODEL ESTIMATION [J].
FEATHER, PM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1994, 76 (04) :772-780
[24]   Sampling of alternatives for route choice modeling [J].
Frejinger, E. ;
Bierlaire, M. ;
Ben-Akiva, M. .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART B-METHODOLOGICAL, 2009, 43 (10) :984-994
[25]   TESTING FOR TEMPORALLY DIFFERENTIATED RELATIONSHIPS AMONG POTENTIALLY CRIMINOGENIC PLACES AND CENSUS BLOCK STREET ROBBERY COUNTS [J].
Haberman, Cory P. ;
Ratcliffe, Jerry H. .
CRIMINOLOGY, 2015, 53 (03) :457-483
[26]   Configural Behavior Settings of Crime Event Locations: Toward an Alternative Conceptualization of Criminogenic Microenvironments [J].
Hart, Timothy C. ;
Miethe, Terance D. .
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN CRIME AND DELINQUENCY, 2015, 52 (03) :373-402
[27]  
Hgerstrand T., 1970, PAPERS REGIONAL SCI, V24, P7, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1435-5597.1970.TB01464.X
[28]  
Irvin-Erickson Y., 2015, CRIME SCI, V4, P14, DOI [10.1186/s40163-015-0026-5, DOI 10.1186/S40163-015-0026-5]
[29]   Testing Ecological Theories of Offender Spatial Decision Making Using a Discrete Choice Model [J].
Johnson, Shane D. ;
Summers, Lucia .
CRIME & DELINQUENCY, 2015, 61 (03) :454-480
[30]   Modeling micro-spatial employment location patterns: A comparison of count and choice approaches [J].
Kim, Hyungtai ;
Waddell, Paul ;
Shankar, Venkataraman N. ;
Ulfarsson, Gudmundur F. .
GEOGRAPHICAL ANALYSIS, 2008, 40 (02) :123-151