Greenhouse gas emissions during timber and concrete building construction - A scenario based comparative case study

被引:101
作者
Sandanayake, Malindu [1 ]
Lokuge, Weena [2 ]
Zhang, Guomin [3 ]
Setunge, Sujeeva [3 ]
Thushar, Quddus [3 ]
机构
[1] Victoria Univ, Coll Engn & Sci, Dept Bldg, Melbourne, Vic 8001, Australia
[2] Univ Southern Queensland, Sch Civil Engn & Surveying, Springfield, Qld 4300, Australia
[3] RMIT Univ, Sch Engn, GPO Box 2476, Melbourne, Vic 3001, Australia
关键词
Greenhouse gas; Concrete; Timber; Buildings; Life cycle assessment; Construction; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL EMISSIONS; INVENTORY ANALYSIS; OFFICE BUILDINGS; EMBODIED ENERGY; CO2; EMISSIONS; IMPACTS; STEEL; WOOD; ALTERNATIVES;
D O I
10.1016/j.scs.2017.12.017
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Greenhouse gas (GHG) is a major air emission pollutant that creates environmental burden in buildings. Timber buildings are gaining notable popularity in the building industry due to life cycle environmental and economic benefits over conventional buildings. However, little or no studies have made attempts to compare greenhouse gas emission variations in timber and concrete buildings during the construction stage. Knowledge of emission at the construction stage is critical for passionate contractors who wants to maintain an environmental friendly built environment. The study presented in this paper aims to compare GHG emissions and energy consumptions during timber and concrete building construction. A process based quantitative assessment is conducted for evaluating emissions from materials, equipment and transportation stages. The comparative results of the study indicated that use of timber can reduce embodied emissions as well as transportation emissions during the construction stage. Scenario analyses results comprehends that recycling of materials and use of regional materials influence GHG emissions the most while transportation distance has medium effect on total GHG emissions at the construction stage of timber building. The results of the study are important in aggregate level decision making of timber and concrete buildings. Further studies are encouraged on conducting comprehensive assessment of different timber usages in a building to investigate the GHG emission variation.
引用
收藏
页码:91 / 97
页数:7
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]  
Alcorn A., 2003, EMBODIED ENERGY CO C
[2]   Use of a hybrid energy analysis method for evaluating the embodied energy of building materials [J].
Alcorn, JA ;
Baird, G .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 1996, 8 (1-4) :319-322
[3]   Life cycle assessment: A case study of a dwelling home in Scotland [J].
Asif, M. ;
Muneer, T. ;
Kelley, R. .
BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2007, 42 (03) :1391-1394
[4]   Multi-storey prestressed timber buildings in New Zealand [J].
Department of Timber Design ;
不详 ;
不详 ;
不详 .
Struct Eng Int J Int Assoc Bridge Struct Eng, 2008, 2 (166-173) :166-173
[5]   Assessment of CO2 emissions reduction in high-rise concrete office buildings using different material use options [J].
Chau, C. K. ;
Hui, W. K. ;
Ng, W. Y. ;
Powell, G. .
RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2012, 61 :22-34
[6]   Energy and greenhouse gas emissions associated with the construction of alternative structural systems [J].
Cole, RJ .
BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 1999, 34 (03) :335-348
[7]   Validation of a hybrid life-cycle inventory analysis method [J].
Crawford, Robert H. .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2008, 88 (03) :496-506
[8]   Need for an embodied energy measurement protocol for buildings: A review paper [J].
Dixit, Manish K. ;
Fernandez-Solis, Jose L. ;
Lavy, Sarel ;
Culp, Charles H. .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2012, 16 (06) :3730-3743
[9]   An environmental assessment of wood and steel reinforced concrete housing construction [J].
Gerilla, G. P. ;
Teknomo, K. ;
Hokao, K. .
BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2007, 42 (07) :2778-2784
[10]   Assessment of the decrease of CO2 emissions in the construction field through the selection of materials:: Practical case study of three houses of low environmental impact [J].
González, MJ ;
Navarro, JG .
BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2006, 41 (07) :902-909