Surgical planning of total hip arthroplasty: accuracy of computer-assisted EndoMap software in predicting component size

被引:52
作者
Davila, JA [1 ]
Kransdorf, MJ [1 ]
Duffy, GP [1 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin Jacksonville, Dept Radiol, Jacksonville, FL 32224 USA
关键词
hip; computer software; templating; prothesis; hip arthroplasty;
D O I
10.1007/s00256-006-0106-4
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: The purpose of our study was to assess the accuracy of a computer-assisted templating in the surgical planning of patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty utilizing EndoMap software (Siemans AG, Medical Solutions, Erlangen, Germany). Endomap Software is an electronic program that uses DICOM images to analyze standard anteroposterior radiographs for determination of optimal prosthesis component size. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the preoperative radiographs of 36 patients undergoing uncomplicated primary total hip arthroplasty, utilizing EndoMap software, Version VA20. DICOM anteroposterior radiographs were analyzed using standard manufacturer supplied electronic templates to determine acetabular and femoral component sizes. No additional clinical information was reviewed. Acetabular and femoral component sizes were assessed by an orthopedic surgeon and two radiologists. Mean and estimated component size was compared with component size as documented in operative reports. Results: The mean estimated acetabular component size was 53 mm (range 48-60 mm), 1 mm larger than the mean implanted size of 52 mm (range 48-62 mm). Thirty-one of 36 acetabular component sizes (86%) were accurate within one size. The mean calculated femoral component size was 4 (range 2-7), 1 size smaller than the actual mean component size of 5 (range 2-9). Twenty-six of 36 femoral component sizes (72%) were accurate within one size, and accurate within two sizes in all but four cases (94%). Conclusion: EndoMap Software predicted femoral component size well, with 72% within one component size of that used, and 94% within two sizes. Acetabular component size was predicted slightly better with 86% within one component size and 94% within two component sizes.
引用
收藏
页码:390 / 393
页数:4
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]  
Bertram T., 2005, Acta Orthop, V76, P78
[2]   Digital templating in total hip arthroplasty [J].
Bono, JV .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2004, 86A :118-122
[3]   DETERMINATION OF ACCURACY OF PREOPERATIVE TEMPLATING OF NONCEMENTED FEMORAL PROSTHESES [J].
CARTER, LW ;
STOVALL, DO ;
YOUNG, TR .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 1995, 10 (04) :507-513
[4]   Preoperative planning for primary total hip arthroplasty [J].
Della Valle, AG ;
Padgett, DE ;
Salvati, EA .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS, 2005, 13 (07) :455-462
[5]   The precision and usefulness of preoperative planning for cemented and hybrid primary total hip arthroplasty [J].
Della Valle, AG ;
Slullitel, G ;
Piccaluga, F ;
Salvati, EA .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2005, 20 (01) :51-58
[6]   The value of preoperative planning for total hip arthroplasty [J].
Eggli, S ;
Pisan, M ;
Muller, ME .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1998, 80B (03) :382-390
[7]  
Knight J L, 1992, J Arthroplasty, V7 Suppl, P403, DOI 10.1016/S0883-5403(07)80031-3
[8]   Hip-Op: an innovative software to plan total hip replacement surgery [J].
Lattanzi, R ;
Viceconti, M ;
Zannoni, C ;
Quadrani, P ;
Toni, A .
MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND THE INTERNET IN MEDICINE, 2002, 27 (02) :71-83
[9]   Electronic imaging impact on image and report turnaround times [J].
Mattern, CWT ;
King, BF ;
Hangiandreou, NJ ;
Swenson, A ;
Jorgenson, LL ;
Webbles, WE ;
Okrzynski, TW ;
Erickson, BJ ;
Williamson, B ;
Forbes, GS .
JOURNAL OF DIGITAL IMAGING, 1999, 12 (02) :155-159
[10]  
MULLER ME, 1992, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P12