Dentin Hypersensitivity: A Randomized Clinical Comparison of Three Different Agents in a Short-term Treatment Period

被引:35
作者
Ozen, T. [1 ]
Orhan, K. [2 ]
Avsever, H. [1 ]
Tunca, Y. M. [3 ]
Ulker, A. E. [4 ]
Akyol, M. [5 ]
机构
[1] Gulhane Mil Med Acad, Dept Oral Diag & Radiol, Sch Dent, Ankara, Turkey
[2] Ankara Univ, Dept Oral Diag & Radiol, Sch Dent, TR-06100 Ankara, Turkey
[3] Gulhane Mil Med Acad, Dept Restorat Dent, Sch Dent, Ankara, Turkey
[4] Yeditepe Univ, Dept Pediat Dent, Sch Dent, Istanbul, Turkey
[5] Gulhane Mil Med Acad, Dept Biostat, Sch Med, Ankara, Turkey
关键词
FLUORIDE VARNISH; CARIES; SENSITIVITY; POPULATION; PREVALENCE; ALLOCATION;
D O I
10.2341/08-118
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective: Dentin hypersensitivity, or what patients may describe as "sensitive teeth," is defined as a short, sharp pain arising from exposed dentin in response to thermal, evaporative, tactile, electrical, osmotic or chemical stimuli. It is widely accepted that dentin hypersensitivity is an uncomfortable condition that also affects function and quality of life. This study determines the differences in efficiency of three desensitizing products when compared with a placebo. Methods: A randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted to compare three different professional dentin desensitizer agents in 52 patients. The age and sex of the patients was recorded. Gluma Desensitizer (Heraeus Kulzer), UltraEZ (Ultradent Products, Inc) and Duraphat (Colgate Oral Pharmaceuticals, Inc, New York, NY, USA) were used as desensitizer agents and distilled water was used as the placebo. The baseline measurement of the dentin hypersensitivity was made by using a visual analog scale WAS). Twenty-four hours and seven days after application of the desensitizer agents and placebo, a new VAS analysis was conducted for patients' sensitivity level. The desensitizer agents were compared in terms of mean values, and ANOVA was used for testing differences among the groups (p<0.05). Results: The results showed that the mean pain scores of the placebo group were significantly higher than that of the study groups (p<0.05). The VAS analysis revealed a significant decrease in dentin hypersensitivity over time with the use of agents (p<0.05). No statistically significant difference was found among the three desensitizing agents (p>0.05). Conclusions: These three desensitizing agents, which contain different active ingredients, were effective in relieving dentin hypersensitivity. However, no superiority was found in dentin sensitivity relief among the agents.
引用
收藏
页码:392 / 398
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Addy M, 2005, INT DENT J, V55, P261
  • [2] Can tooth brushing damage your health? Effects on oral and dental tissues
    Addy, M
    Hunter, ML
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL DENTAL JOURNAL, 2003, 53 (03) : 177 - 186
  • [3] ADDY M, 2002, INT DENT J, V52, P375
  • [4] Statistics notes - Concealing treatment allocation in randomised trials
    Altman, DG
    Schulz, KF
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2001, 323 (7310): : 446 - 447
  • [5] Penetration of varnishes into demineralized root dentine in vitro
    Arends, J
    Duschner, H
    Ruben, JL
    [J]. CARIES RESEARCH, 1997, 31 (03) : 201 - 205
  • [6] AROWOJOLU M, 2002, NIGERIAN J CLIN PRAC, V5, P87
  • [7] Enamel fluoride uptake of a novel water-based fluoride varnish
    Attin, T
    Grieme, R
    Paqué, F
    Hannig, C
    Buchalla, W
    Attin, R
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF ORAL BIOLOGY, 2005, 50 (03) : 317 - 322
  • [8] Autio-Gold JT, 2004, OPER DENT, V29, P636
  • [10] Dentinal hypersensitivity: a review
    Bartold, P. M.
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN DENTAL JOURNAL, 2006, 51 (03) : 212 - 218