The capacity of multiple-target search

被引:45
作者
Ort, Eduard [1 ,2 ]
Olivers, Christian N. L. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Heinrich Heine Univ Dusseldorf, Inst Expt Psychol, Biol Psychol Decis Making, Univ Str 1, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany
[2] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Dept Expt & Appl Psychol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Inst Brain & Behav Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
基金
欧洲研究理事会; 欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Visual attention; visual working memory; multiple-target search; visual search; capacity;
D O I
10.1080/13506285.2020.1772430
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Can individuals look for multiple objects at the same time? A simple question, but answering it has proven difficult. In this review, we describe possible cognitive architectures and their predictions about the capacity of visual search. We broadly distinguish three stages at which limitations may occur: (1) preparation (establishing and maintaining a mental representation of a search target), (2) selection (using this mental representation to extract candidate targets from the visual input), and (3) post-selection processing (verifying that the selected information actually is a target). We then review the empirical evidence from various paradigms, together with their strengths and pitfalls. The emerging picture is that multiple target search comes with costs, but the magnitude of this cost differs depending on the processing stage. Selection appears strongly limited, while preparation of multiple search target representations in anticipation of a search is possible with relatively small costs. Finally, there is currently not sufficient information to determine the capacity limitations of post-selection processing. We hope that our review contributes to better targeted research into the mechanisms of multiple-target search. A better understanding of multiple-target search will also contribute to better design of real-life multiple-target search problems, reducing the risk of detrimental search failures.
引用
收藏
页码:330 / 355
页数:26
相关论文
共 211 条
[61]   The N2pc component as an indicator of attentional selectivity [J].
Eimer, M .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1996, 99 (03) :225-234
[62]   Involuntary attentional capture is determined by task set: Evidence from event-related brain potentials [J].
Eimer, Martin ;
Kiss, Monika .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2008, 20 (08) :1423-1433
[63]   The neural basis of attentional control in visual search [J].
Eimer, Martin .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2014, 18 (10) :526-535
[64]   The top-down control of visual selection and how it is linked to the N2pc component [J].
Eimer, Martin ;
Kiss, Monika .
ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 2010, 135 (02) :100-102
[65]   From ERPs to MVPA Using the Amsterdam Decoding and Modeling Toolbox (ADAM) [J].
Fahrenfort, Johannes J. ;
van Driel, Joram ;
van Gaal, Simon ;
Olivers, Christian N. L. .
FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE, 2018, 12
[66]   Multivariate EEG analyses support high-resolution tracking of feature-based attentional selection [J].
Fahrenfort, Johannes Jacobus ;
Grubert, Anna ;
Olivers, Christian N. L. ;
Eimer, Martin .
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2017, 7
[67]   Selection history: How reward modulates selectivity of visual attention [J].
Failing, Michel ;
Theeuwes, Jan .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2018, 25 (02) :514-538
[68]   Multiple representations in visual working memory simultaneously guide attention: The type of memory-matching representation matters [J].
Fan, Lingxia ;
Sun, Mengdan ;
Xu, Mengsi ;
Li, Zhiai ;
Diao, Liuting ;
Zhang, Xuemin .
ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 2019, 192 :126-137
[69]   Target-uncertainty effects in attentional capture: Color-singleton set or multiple attentional control settings? [J].
Folk, Charles L. ;
Anderson, Brian A. .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2010, 17 (03) :421-426
[70]   Made you blink! Contingent attentional capture produces a spatial blink [J].
Folk, CL ;
Leber, AB ;
Egeth, HE .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2002, 64 (05) :741-753