Does vasectomy explain the difference in tubal sterilization rates between black and white women?

被引:16
作者
Borrero, Sonya [1 ,2 ]
Schwarz, Eleanor B. [3 ]
Reeves, Matthew F. [3 ]
Bost, James E. [4 ]
Creinin, Mitchell D. [3 ,5 ]
Ibrahim, Said A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Ctr Res Hlth Care, Sch Med, Div Gen Internal Med, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
[2] VA Pittsburgh Healthcare Syst, Ctr Hlth Equ & Promot, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Sci, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[4] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Med, Inst Clin Res Educ, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[5] Univ Pittsburgh, Grad Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Pittsburgh, PA USA
关键词
National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG); race/ethnicity; tubal sterilization; vasectomy; UNITED-STATES; CONTRACEPTIVE STERILIZATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.01.103
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To examine whether the observed difference in tubal sterilization rates between black and white women is dependent on racial/ethnic differences in vasectomy rates. Design: Secondary analysis of national, cross-sectional survey. Setting: 2002 National Survey of Family Growth. Patient(s): Women 15 to 44 years old with a current partner who were able to provide information about their partner's vasectomy status. Intervention(s): None. Main Outcome Measure(s): The primary outcome was tubal sterilization. Among women with a current partner who had not undergone vasectomy, a multivariable logistic regession model was used to estimate the effects of race/ethnicity on tubal sterilization after adjusting for potential confounders. Result(s): Of the 3,391 women in the sample, 14% of white women had a current partner who had undergone vasectomy compared with 5% of Hispanic women and 4% of black women. Among the 3.064 women whose partners had not undergone vasectomy, black women were more likely to undergo tubal sterilization (odds ratio: 1.6; 95% confidence interval: 1.1, 2.2) on the basis of adjusted multivariable analysis. Conclusion(s): After controlling for partner vasectomy status, black women were still more likely to undergo tubal sterilization than white women. (Fertil Steril (R) 2009;91:1642-5. (C)2009 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.)
引用
收藏
页码:1642 / 1645
页数:4
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2003, Unequal Treatment: Confronting Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care
[2]   Race, insurance status, and tubal sterilization [J].
Borrero, Sonya ;
Schwarz, Eleanor B. ;
Reeves, Matthew F. ;
Bost, James E. ;
Creinin, Mitchell D. ;
Ibrahim, Said A. .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2007, 109 (01) :94-100
[3]   Women, men, and contraceptive sterilization [J].
Bumpass, LL ;
Thomson, E ;
Godecker, AL .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2000, 73 (05) :937-946
[4]  
CHANDRA A, 1998, ADV DATA VITAL HLTH, V23
[5]   Union status, marital history and female contraceptive sterilization in the United States [J].
Godecker, AL ;
Thomson, E ;
Bumpass, LL .
FAMILY PLANNING PERSPECTIVES, 2001, 33 (01) :35-+
[6]   Poststerilization regret: Findings from the United States collaborative review of sterilization [J].
Hillis, SD ;
Marchbanks, PA ;
Tylor, LR ;
Peterson, HB .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1999, 93 (06) :889-895
[7]   Tubal sterilization in the United States, 1994-1996 [J].
MacKay, AP ;
Kieke, BA ;
Koonin, LM ;
Beattie, K .
FAMILY PLANNING PERSPECTIVES, 2001, 33 (04) :161-165
[8]  
Mosher W.D., 2004, ADV DATA VITAL HLTH, V350
[9]  
National Center for Health Statistics, NAT SURV FAM GROWTH
[10]   SOCIAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVES ON VOLUNTARY STERILIZATION - A REVIEW [J].
PHILLIBER, SG ;
PHILLIBER, WW .
STUDIES IN FAMILY PLANNING, 1985, 16 (01) :1-29