Sustainable material selection for construction industry - A hybrid multi criteria decision making approach

被引:176
作者
Govindan, Kannan [1 ]
Shankar, K. Madan [2 ]
Kannan, Devika [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southern Denmark, Dept Econ & Business, DK-5230 Odense, Denmark
[2] PTR Coll Engn & Technol, Dept Mech Engn, Madurai 625008, Tamil Nadu, India
[3] Univ Southern Denmark, Dept Technol & Innovat, DK-5230 Odense, Denmark
关键词
Sustainable construction; Sustainable indicator; Sustainable material selection; Hybrid MCDM; UAE; EXERGY PERFORMANCE; WASTE MANAGEMENT; COLD-STORAGE; DEMATEL; INDICATORS; FRAMEWORK; TOPSIS; MODEL; ANP; EXTENSION;
D O I
10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.100
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Urbanization and globalization has led to a rapid development in the construction industry. Many strategies have been proposed to improve cost effectiveness in this sector. Over the last decade, cost concerns have been balanced with a growing debate on the necessity for sustainable construction practices. Because of depleting resources and environmental concerns, researchers and practitioners have begun to explore sustainable construction strategies. Among these strategies is the selection of sustainable materials which play a vital role in a building's environmental footprint. In the UAE in particular, there is an ongoing demand to select the best sustainable construction materials because the industry is growing so rapidly in this nation. Thus, the main intent of this paper is to propose a model to evaluate the best sustainable construction material based on sustainable indicators through a hybrid multi criteria decision making (MCDM) methodology with a specific examination of the UAE. The indicators collected from existing literatures were used in evaluation of sustainable construction materials with the assistance of construction sector-based respondents. The proposed framework was validated with a case study company, and the results were compared to the existing literatures and to feedback from the respondents. Finally, the study concludes with an assessment of its own limitations along with the identification of some useful managerial implications; it sheds some light on future possible enhancements in the theme of sustainable construction in the context of UAE. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1274 / 1288
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   A hybrid fuzzy multi-criteria decision making model for selecting a sustainable supplier of forklift filters: a case study from the mining industry [J].
Ortiz-Barrios, Miguel ;
Cabarcas-Reyes, Juan ;
Ishizaka, Alessio ;
Barbati, Maria ;
Jaramillo-Rueda, Natalia ;
de Jesus Carrascal-Zambrano, Giovani .
ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2021, 307 (1-2) :443-481
[32]   Optimal selection of safety recommendations: A hybrid fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making approach to HAZOP [J].
Cheraghi, Morteza ;
Baladeh, Aliakbar Eslami ;
Khakzad, Nima .
JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, 2022, 74
[33]   Leagile and sustainable supplier selection problem in the Industry 4.0 era: a case study of the medical devices using hybrid multi-criteria decision making tool [J].
Nejad, Ali Akbar Forouzesh .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2023, 30 (05) :13418-13437
[34]   A decision making methodology for material selection in sugar industry using hybrid MCDM techniques [J].
Anojkumar, L. ;
Ilangkumaran, M. ;
Vignesh, M. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MATERIALS & PRODUCT TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 51 (02) :102-126
[35]   A hybrid multi-criteria decision-making approach to evaluate interrelationships and impacts of supply chain performance factors on pharmaceutical industry [J].
Khan, Sharfuddin Ahmed ;
Gupta, Himanshu ;
Gunasekaran, Angappa ;
Mubarik, Muhammad Shujaat ;
Lawal, Jennifer .
JOURNAL OF MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS, 2023, 30 (1-2) :62-90
[36]   Integrated multi-criteria decision-making approach for power generation technology selection in sustainable energy systems [J].
Hernandez-Torres, Jose Antonio ;
Sanchez-Lozano, Daniel ;
Sanchez-Herrera, Reyes ;
Vera, David ;
Torreglosa, Juan P. .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2025, 243
[37]   A Hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach Based on ANP-Entropy TOPSIS for Building Materials Supplier Selection [J].
Chen, Chun-Ho .
ENTROPY, 2021, 23 (12)
[38]   A hybrid multi-criteria decision-making approach for longitudinal data [J].
Chejarla, Kalyana C. ;
Vaidya, Omkarprasad S. .
OPSEARCH, 2024, 61 (03) :1013-1060
[39]   Service selection using fuzzy multi-criteria decision making: a comprehensive review [J].
Masdari, Mohammad ;
Khezri, Hemn .
JOURNAL OF AMBIENT INTELLIGENCE AND HUMANIZED COMPUTING, 2021, 12 (02) :2803-2834
[40]   A hybrid multi-criteria decision making method approach for selecting a sustainable location of healthcare waste disposal facility [J].
Chauhan, Ankur ;
Singh, Amol .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2016, 139 :1001-1010