Evaluation of genetic variability in Ponwar cattle by microsatellite markers

被引：5
|
作者：
Sharma, Rekha [1 ]
Pandey, A. K. [1 ]
Singh, Yatender [1 ]
Prakash, B. [1 ]
机构：
[1] Natl Bur Anim Genet Resources, Karnal 132001, Haryana, India
来源：
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ANIMAL RESEARCH | 2006年 / 30卷 / 01期
关键词：
cattle; genetic variation; microsatellite; Ponwar;
D O I：
10.1080/09712119.2006.9706826
中图分类号：
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号：
0905 ;
摘要：
This study was conducted to determine the genetic variation of Ponwar cattle, a draft purpose breed, presently in small number. A total of 141 alleles were detected by 24 microsatellite markers. Microsatellites were highly polymorphic with mean allelic number 5.875 +/- 1.727 (ranging from 3-10 per locus). Observed heterozygosity, expected heterozygosity and observed and effective number of alleles were used to estimate the genetic variation of the breed. The observed heterozygosity in the population was 0.497 +/- 0.177, reflecting less genetic variation in this population. Population showed inbreeding (f=0.262) and heterozygote deficit. Genetic bottleneck was absent. The study revealed that breed needs immediate genetic management for the conservation and improvement.
引用
收藏
页码：63 / 67
页数：5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluation of genetic variability in Kenkatha cattle by microsatellite markers
    Pandey, A. K.
    Sharma, Rekha
    Singh, Yatender
    Prakash, B.
    Ahlawat, S. P. S.
    ASIAN-AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCES, 2006, 19 (12): : 1685 - 1690
  • [2] Assessment of genetic variability in Gangatiri cattle by microsatellite markers
    Sharma, R
    Pandey, AK
    Singh, Y
    Prakash, B
    Ahlawat, SPS
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF GENETICS, 2006, 28 (01): : 35 - 42
  • [3] Evaluation of the genetic variability of 23 bovine microsatellite markers in four Belgian cattle breeds
    Peelman, LJ
    Mortiaux, F
    Van Zeveren, A
    Dansercoer, A
    Mommens, G
    Coopman, F
    Bouquet, Y
    Burny, A
    Renaville, R
    Portetelle, D
    ANIMAL GENETICS, 1998, 29 (03) : 161 - 167
  • [4] Microsatellite Markers Based Genetic Evaluation of Pakistani Cattle Breeds
    Hussain, Tanveer
    Babar, Masroor Ellahi
    Peters, Sunday O.
    Wajid, Abdul
    Ali, Akhtar
    Azam, Amber
    Ahmad, Zahoor
    Wasim, Muhammad
    Ali, Ahmad
    Kizilkaya, Kadir
    De Donato, Marcos
    Imumorin, Ikhide G.
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY, 2016, 48 (06) : 1633 - 1641
  • [5] Evaluation of the genetic variability of microsatellite markers in Saudi Arabian camels
    Al-Swailem, Abdulaziz M.
    Shehata, Maher M.
    Al-Busadah, Khalid A.
    Fallatah, Maged H.
    Askari, Ejaz
    JOURNAL OF FOOD AGRICULTURE & ENVIRONMENT, 2009, 7 (02): : 636 - 639
  • [6] Assessment of genetic variability in Hill cattle of Garhwal region of Uttarakhand by microsatellite markers
    Prakash, B.
    Pundir, R. K.
    Singh, P. K.
    Deepika
    Sharma, D.
    Neelkant
    Singh, C. V.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCES, 2012, 82 (11): : 1353 - 1357
  • [7] Genetic variability of 10 microsatellite markers in the characterization of Brazilian Nellore cattle (Bos indicus)
    Cervini, Marcelo
    Henrique-Silva, Flavio
    Mortari, Norma
    Matheucci, Euclides, Jr.
    GENETICS AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2006, 29 (03) : 486 - 490
  • [8] Evaluation of the genetic variability of 13 microsatellite markers in native Indian pigs
    Rajeev Kaul
    Atar Singh
    R. K. Vijh
    M. S. Tantia
    Rahul Behl
    Journal of Genetics, 2001, 80 : 149 - 153
  • [9] Genetic variability and relationships in nine South African cattle breeds using microsatellite markers
    Lené van der Westhuizen
    Michael D. MacNeil
    Michiel M. Scholtz
    Frederick W. C. Neser
    Makglako L. Makgahlela
    Japie B. van Wyk
    Tropical Animal Health and Production, 2020, 52 : 177 - 184
  • [10] Genetic variability and relationships in nine South African cattle breeds using microsatellite markers
    van der Westhuizen, Lene
    MacNeil, Michael D.
    Scholtz, Michiel M.
    Neser, Frederick W. C.
    Makgahlela, Makglako L.
    van Wyk, Japie B.
    TROPICAL ANIMAL HEALTH AND PRODUCTION, 2020, 52 (01) : 177 - 184
12345