A model of clinical problem-based learning for clinical attachments in medicine

被引:25
作者
Macallan, Derek C. [1 ]
Kent, Andrew [2 ]
Holmes, Sandra C. [3 ]
Farmer, Elizabeth A. [4 ]
McCrorie, Peter [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ London, Ctr Infect Cellular & Mol Med, Div Cellular & Mol Med, London SW17 0RE, England
[2] Univ London, Div Mental Hlth, London SW17 0RE, England
[3] Univ London, Ctr Med & Healthcare Educ, London SW17 0RE, England
[4] Univ Wollongong, Grad Sch Med, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
EDUCATIONAL PRACTICE; NONEXPERT TUTORS; DELPHI APPROACH; CURRICULUM; EXPERT; ENVIRONMENT; EXPERIENCE; FUTURE;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03406.x
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Context Problem-based learning (PBL) has been widely adopted in medical curricula for early-years training, but its use during clinical attachments has not been extensively explored. Objectives This study aimed to develop and evaluate a new model, 'clinical problem-based learning' (CPBL), to promote learning skills, attitudes and knowledge during clinical attachments. Methods The CPBL model takes the principles of PBL and applies them to learning during clinical attachments. Real patient encounters are guided by a list of broadly defined case types to ensure curriculum coverage. By discussing history taking and examination in the context of differential diagnosis and problem listing, students generate learning objectives relating to clinical skills, disease mechanisms and clinical management. These are explored through self-directed learning before the second tutorial, in which the tutor takes the role of 'expert', demonstrating how learned material translates into clinical practice. We evaluated which components contributed most to the success of the model using semi-structured questionnaires, focus groups and a consensus (Delphi process) method. Results Students found CPBL a positive learning experience. Identification of suitable cases for discussion was readily achieved, although follow-up was sometimes difficult. The tutor's level of expertise and a non-threatening learning environment, conducive to student questioning, were highly rated contributors to successful CPBL. Comments reinforced the view that CPBL is a parallel teaching approach that helps structure the teaching week, but does not replace traditional bedside teaching. Conclusions Clinical problem-based learning was well received in clinical placements. Key elements were the learning interval, the involvement of expert tutors and a non-threatening learning environment.
引用
收藏
页码:799 / 807
页数:9
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
Albanese M., 2007, PROBLEM BASED LEARNI
[2]   Evaluation of a change from traditional case studies to patient-based, problem-based learning: a case study [J].
Barrington, D ;
Wing, L ;
Latimer, K ;
Alpers, J ;
Prideaux, D .
MEDICAL TEACHER, 1997, 19 (02) :104-107
[3]  
Barrows H., 1985, DESIGN PROBLEM BASED
[4]  
Bochner Daniela, 2002, J Dent Educ, V66, P1246
[5]  
CAMP MG, 1993, ACAD MED, V68, P353, DOI 10.1097/00001888-199305000-00011
[6]   Research on problem-based learning: the need for critical analysis of methods and findings [J].
Colliver, Jerry A. ;
Markwell, Stephen J. .
MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2007, 41 (06) :533-535
[7]  
Couper M R, 1984, ANS Adv Nurs Sci, V7, P72
[8]   Using real patients in problem-based learning: students' comments on the value of using real, as opposed to paper cases, in a problem-based learning module in general practice [J].
Dammers, J ;
Spencer, J ;
Thomas, M .
MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2001, 35 (01) :27-34
[9]   Student perceptions of a virtual learning environment for a problem-based learning undergraduate medical curriculum [J].
de Leng, Bas A. ;
Dolmans, Diana H. J. M. ;
Muijtjens, Arno M. M. ;
Van der Vleuten, Cees P. M. .
MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2006, 40 (06) :568-575
[10]  
Delbecq AndreL., 1975, GROUP TECHNIQUES PRO, P83