Professional Development, Departmental Contexts, and Use of Instructional Strategies

被引:25
作者
Lattuca, Lisa R. [1 ]
Bergom, Inger [1 ]
Knight, David B. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Ctr Study Higher & Postsecondary Educ, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Virginia Tech, Engn Educ, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Classroom instruction; faculty development; organizational influences; FACULTY; SCIENCE; INSTITUTE; WORK;
D O I
10.1002/jee.20055
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
BackgroundA report from the American Society for Engineering Education (Jamieson & Lohmann, 2012) identified career-long professional development for faculty, teacher training in graduate programs, departmental climates that value and support educational innovation, and reward systems that recognize achievements in educational innovation as mechanisms to improve undergraduate engineering education. These factors have long been assumed to influence faculty members' choices to engage in educational improvements, but their relationships with teaching practices rarely have been studied. PurposeWe examined the relationships among professional development, departmental contexts, and engineering faculty members' use of student-centered teaching practices. Design/MethodThis study drew on a nationally representative survey dataset of 906 engineering faculty members from 31 four-year institutions. We used multiple regression analyses to investigate whether graduate training, professional development, and institutional factors (e.g., reward systems) relate to engineering faculty members' use of student-centered teaching practices, such as active learning and frequent and detailed feedback to students. ResultsProfessional development activities and, to a lesser extent, graduate training in teaching positively related to the use of student-centered teaching practices. We provide some of the first evidence that graduate training in teaching is linked to the use of student-centered teaching practices. Only modest relationships were observed between departmental environments and teaching practices. ConclusionEngineering departments seeking to increase the use of student-centered teaching practices should consider supporting faculty engagement in on- and off-campus professional development activities. Supporting these activities may be more effective than emphasizing research on engineering education and curriculum enhancement in reward decisions.
引用
收藏
页码:549 / 572
页数:24
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]  
ABET, 2013, ENGINEERING CRITERIA
[2]  
Ambrose S.A., 2006, The Bridge, V36, P25
[3]  
[Anonymous], THE ENGINEER OF 2020
[4]  
[Anonymous], J GRADUATE TEACHING
[5]  
[Anonymous], ASHE HIGHER EDUCATIO
[6]  
[Anonymous], EDUCATING THE ENGINE
[7]  
[Anonymous], HOW PEOPLE LEARN BRA
[8]  
Armor D.J., 1974, SOCIOLOGICAL METHODO, P17, DOI DOI 10.2307/270831
[9]  
Austin A.E., 2004, PATHS PROFESSORIATE, P3, DOI DOI 10.2139/SSRN.1699342
[10]   Preparing the next generation of faculty - Graduate school as socialization to the academic career [J].
Austin, AE .
JOURNAL OF HIGHER EDUCATION, 2002, 73 (01) :94-+