Navigating conflicting landscape aspirations: Application of a photo-based Q-method in Transylvania (Central Romania)

被引:66
作者
Milcu, Andra Ioana [1 ]
Sherren, Kate [2 ]
Hanspach, Jan [1 ]
Abson, David [3 ]
Fischer, Joern [1 ]
机构
[1] Leuphana Univ Lueneburg, Fac Sustainabil, Inst Ecol, D-21335 Luneburg, Germany
[2] Dalhousie Univ, Sch Resource & Environm Studies, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada
[3] Leuphana Univ, Futures Ecosyst Serv FuturES Res Ctr, D-21335 Luneburg, Germany
关键词
Cultural landscape; Landscape preference; Modernization; Multifunctional; Q methodology; Tradition; SOCIAL-ECOLOGICAL SYSTEM; LAND-USE CHANGE; CULTURAL LANDSCAPE; BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; RURAL-DEVELOPMENT; COLLECTIVE ACTION; PERSPECTIVES; RESILIENCE; POLICY;
D O I
10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.06.019
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In combination, the economic realities brought about by globalization, and the sustainability goals set by the European Union, translate into contradictory challenges for European cultural landscapes. With its high natural and cultural diversity, Transylvania (Central Romania) is facing the choice between development based on a "production for profit" logic, with the risks of a liberalized land market, versus a largely untested development pathway based on sustainability, landscape multifunctionality and conservation. In the context of these largely externally imposed and contradictory development pathways, clarifying the viewpoints and preferences of local people is important, and may help explain the outcomes of past policies, as well as inform future interventions. We undertook a photograph-based Q methodology study - interviewing 129 residents from 30 villages - to understand and explore the diverse range of landscape preferences held by locals in Southern Transylvania. We clarified these preferences by identifying groups of participants who shared similar viewpoints regarding local landscapes and their changing purpose. Our findings revealed five different "preference narratives" about Transylvanian landscapes, namely (1) landscapes for prosperity and economic growth; (2) landscapes for traditions and balanced lifestyles; (3) landscapes for human benefit; (4) landscapes for farming; and (5) landscapes for nature. Our systematic assessment of narratives showed areas of consensus and disagreement among participants. We relate the five preference narratives to current management approaches targeting rural landscapes. We conclude by suggesting policy approaches to tackle the diversity of opinions and interests found in this culturally and ecologically diverse landscape. Important policy priorities include fostering economic diversification and improving social capital, (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:408 / 422
页数:15
相关论文
共 111 条
[1]  
Adger WN, 2003, ECON GEOGR, V79, P387
[2]  
Akeroyd J., 2012, NATRO000618 LIFE09 F
[3]  
Akeroyd J, 2006, Nature Conservation. Environmental Science and Engineering (Environmental Science), P199, DOI [10.1007/978-3-540-47229-2_21, DOI 10.1007/978-3-540-47229-2, DOI 10.1007/978-3-540-47229-2_21]
[4]   Reverse tenancy in Romania: Actors' rationales and equity outcomes [J].
Amblard, Laurence ;
Colin, Jean-Philippe .
LAND USE POLICY, 2009, 26 (03) :828-836
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2013, J LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, DOI [DOI 10.2478/V10285-012-0062-8, 10.2478/v10285-012-0062-8.]
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1980, POLITICAL SUBJECTIVI
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2013, MEMO13621 EUR COMM
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2010, EUR 2020 EUR STRAT S
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2011 POP HOUS CENS D
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Current State and Trends: Findings of the Condition and Trends Working Group