A straight alley version of the BBB locomotor scale

被引:20
作者
Wong, Jamie K. [1 ]
Sharp, Kelli [2 ]
Steward, Oswald [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Neurobiol & Behav, Irvine, CA 92697 USA
[2] Univ Calif Irvine, Reeve Irvine Res Ctr, Irvine, CA 92697 USA
[3] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Anat & Neurobiol, Irvine, CA 92697 USA
[4] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Neurosurg, Irvine, CA 92697 USA
[5] Univ Calif Irvine, Ctr Neurobiol Learning & Memory, Irvine, CA 92697 USA
关键词
Spinal cord injury; Hindlimb motor function; Recovery of function; SPINAL-CORD; RATS;
D O I
10.1016/j.expneurol.2009.03.037
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
We describe here an alternative Procedure for assessing hindlimb locomotor function after spinal cord injury that uses the BBB scale, but tests animals in a reward-baited straight alley rather than an open field. Rats were trained to ambulate in a straight alley and habituated to the open field typically used for BBB open field testing. Three groups of rats were tested. Sprague-Dawley rats received either 200 kD (n = 19) or 300 kD contusions (n = 9) at T9 with the Infinite Horizon device. Fisher rats (n = 8) received moderate contusions (12.5 mm) at T8 with the NYU impactor. BBB scores were assessed at different post-injury intervals in the open field and the straight alley, and scores were compared by correlation analyses. BBB scores in the open field vs. the straight alley were highly correlated (r=0.90), validating the use of the straight alley for locomotor assessment. Rats exhibited a larger number of bouts of continuous steps in the straight alley vs. the open field (termed passes), providing More opportunities to Score hindlimb use and coordination over the 4 min testing interval. Comparisons of scores across days revealed higher day-to-day correlations in the straight alley vs. the open field (r(2) values of 0.90 and 0.74 for the straight alley and open field respectively), revealing that the straight alley yielded more reliable scores. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:417 / 420
页数:4
相关论文
共 5 条
[1]   A SENSITIVE AND RELIABLE LOCOMOTOR RATING-SCALE FOR OPEN-FIELD TESTING IN RATS [J].
BASSO, DM ;
BEATTIE, MS ;
BRESNAHAN, JC .
JOURNAL OF NEUROTRAUMA, 1995, 12 (01) :1-21
[2]   Graded histological and locomotor outcomes after spinal cord contusion using the NYU weight-drop device versus transection [J].
Basso, DM ;
Beattie, MS ;
Bresnahan, JC .
EXPERIMENTAL NEUROLOGY, 1996, 139 (02) :244-256
[3]   Comparing deficits following excitotoxic and contusion injuries in the thoracic and lumbar spinal cord of the adult rat [J].
Magnuson, DSK ;
Trinder, TC ;
Zhang, YP ;
Burke, D ;
Morassutti, DJ ;
Shields, CB .
EXPERIMENTAL NEUROLOGY, 1999, 156 (01) :191-204
[4]   cAMP and Schwann cells promote axonal growth and functional recovery after spinal cord injury [J].
Pearse, DD ;
Pereira, FC ;
Marcillo, AE ;
Bates, ML ;
Berrocal, YA ;
Filbin, MT ;
Bunge, MB .
NATURE MEDICINE, 2004, 10 (06) :610-616
[5]   Compensatory locomotor adjustments of rats with cervical or thoracic spinal cord hemisections [J].
Webb, AA ;
Muir, GD .
JOURNAL OF NEUROTRAUMA, 2002, 19 (02) :239-256