Effects of Enterococcus faecalis on egg production, egg quality and caecal microbiota of hens during the late laying period

被引:33
作者
Zhang, Yaowen [1 ]
Ma, Wenfeng [1 ]
Zhang, Zhidan [1 ]
Liu, Fangyuan [1 ]
Wang, Jie [1 ]
Yin, Yulong [2 ]
Wang, Zhanbin [1 ]
机构
[1] Henan Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Anim Sci & Technol, Henan Prov Academician Workstn Feed Resource Dev, Luoyang, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Sci, Observat & Expt Stn Anim Nutr & Feed Sci South Ce, Minist Agr,Hunan Prov Engn Res Ctr Hlth Livestock, Key Lab Agroecol Proc Subtrop Reg,Inst Subtrop Ag, Changsha, Hunan, Peoples R China
关键词
Enterococcus faecalis; egg production; egg quality; gut microbiome; laying hens; probiotics; GROWTH-PERFORMANCE; PROBIOTIC SUPPLEMENTATION; SP-NOV; MICROFLORA; DIETS; FAECIUM; GENETICS; STRAIN; ENERGY; SERUM;
D O I
10.1080/1745039X.2019.1591128
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
This study was conducted to determine the effects of diet supplementation of laying hens with Enterococcus faecalis (EF) on egg production, egg quality and caecal microbiota. A total of 360 Hy-Line Brown laying hens (72 weeks old) were divided into three groups with four replicates of 30 birds each. The laying hens were fed with the basal diet (Control), the basal diet + 3.75 center dot 10(8) cfu EF/kg (Group I) or the basal diet + 7.5 center dot 10(8) cfu EF/kg (Group II). The experiment lasted for 45 d. Eggs and caecal samples were collected at the end of the experiment. Results showed that dietary supplementation with EF did not affect the average daily egg weight, cracked egg rate, mortality and egg quality. However, EF supplementation caused a significantly increased laying rate and decreased feed/egg ratio (p < 0.05). The differences in caecal microbiota between Group II and the Control were significant. The relative abundance of Verrucomicrobia and Cyanobacteria at the phylum level, Rikenellaceae, Christensenellaceae and Veillonellaceae at the family level, and the Faecalibacterium, Christensenellaceae R-7 group and Eubacterium coprostanoligenes group at the genus level changed significantly in Group II compared with the Control (p 0.05). In conclusion, the tested dietary supplementations with EF improved product performance and affected the caecal microbial community structure of laying hens during the late laying period.
引用
收藏
页码:208 / 221
页数:14
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   Effects of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens as a probiotic strain on growth performance, cecal microflora, and fecal noxious gas emissions of broiler chickens [J].
Ahmed, Sonia Tabasum ;
Islam, Md. Manirul ;
Mun, Hong-Seok ;
Sim, Hyeon-Ju ;
Kim, Ye-Jin ;
Yang, Chul-Ju .
POULTRY SCIENCE, 2014, 93 (08) :1963-1971
[2]   Antibiotics in agriculture and the risk to human health: how worried should we be? [J].
Chang, Qiuzhi ;
Wang, Weike ;
Regev-Yochay, Gili ;
Lipsitch, Marc ;
Hanage, William P. .
EVOLUTIONARY APPLICATIONS, 2015, 8 (03) :240-247
[3]   Direct-fed microbial PrimaLac and salinomycin modulate whole-body and intestinal oxygen consumption and intestinal mucosal cytokine production in the broiler chick [J].
Chichlowski, M. ;
Croom, J. ;
McBride, B. W. ;
Daniel, L. ;
Davis, G. ;
Koci, M. D. .
POULTRY SCIENCE, 2007, 86 (06) :1100-1106
[4]   Intestinal microbiome analyses identify melanoma patients at risk for checkpoint-blockade-induced colitis [J].
Dubin, Krista ;
Callahan, Margaret K. ;
Ren, Boyu ;
Khanin, Raya ;
Viale, Agnes ;
Ling, Lilan ;
No, Daniel ;
Gobourne, Asia ;
Littmann, Eric ;
Huttenhower, Curtis ;
Pamer, Eric G. ;
Wolchok, Jedd D. .
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2016, 7
[5]  
Franz CMAP, 2010, FEMS MICROBIOL REV, V31, P293
[6]  
FULLER R, 1989, J APPL BACTERIOL, V66, P365
[7]   Human Genetics Shape the Gut Microbiome [J].
Goodrich, Julia K. ;
Waters, Jillian L. ;
Poole, Angela C. ;
Sutter, Jessica L. ;
Koren, Omry ;
Blekhman, Ran ;
Beaumont, Michelle ;
Van Treuren, William ;
Knight, Rob ;
Bell, Jordana T. ;
Spector, Timothy D. ;
Clark, Andrew G. ;
Ley, Ruth E. .
CELL, 2014, 159 (04) :789-799
[8]  
Graf J., 2014, The family rikenellaceae, P857, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-38954-2_134
[9]   THE EFFECTS OF THE GUT MICROFLORA AND DIETARY FIBER ON ENERGY-UTILIZATION BY THE CHICK [J].
HEGDE, SN ;
ROLLS, BA ;
COATES, ME .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF NUTRITION, 1982, 48 (01) :73-80
[10]   Bacterial contributions to mammalian gut development [J].
Hooper, LV .
TRENDS IN MICROBIOLOGY, 2004, 12 (03) :129-134