A reliability-based fragility assessment method for seismic pounding between nonlinear buildings

被引:6
作者
Liu, Pei [1 ]
Zhu, Hai-Xin [1 ]
Fan, Peng-Peng [1 ]
Yang, Wei-Guo [1 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Jiaotong Univ, Sch Civil Engn, Beijing 100044, Peoples R China
基金
国家重点研发计划;
关键词
Seismic pounding; nonlinear adjacent buildings; fragility assessment; risk assessment; pounding occurrence; SEPARATION DISTANCE; PERFORMANCE; RISK; PROBABILITY; MITIGATION; FRAMES; DAMAGE; MODEL;
D O I
10.12989/sem.2021.77.1.019
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Existing methods to estimate the probability of seismic pounding occurrence of adjacent buildings do not account for nonlinear behavior or only apply to simple lumped mass systems. The present study proposes an efficient method based on subset simulation for fragility and risk assessment of seismic pounding occurrence between nonlinear adjacent buildings neglecting pounding effects with application to finite element models. The proposed method is first applied to adjacent buildings modeled as elastoplastic systems with substantially different dynamic properties for different structural parameters. Seismic pounding fragility and risk of adjacent frame structures with different floor levels is then assessed, paying special attention to modeling the non-linear material behavior in finite element models. Difference in natural periods and impact location are identified to affect the pounding fragility simultaneously. The reliability levels of the minimum code-specified separation distances are also determined. In addition, the incremental dynamic analysis method is extended to assess seismic pounding fragility of the adjacent frame structures, resulting in higher fragility estimates for separation distances larger than the minimum code-specified ones in comparison with the proposed method.
引用
收藏
页码:19 / 35
页数:17
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
Anagnostopoulos SA, 1996, 11 WORLD C EARTHQ EN
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2014, Engineering risk assessment with subset simulation, DOI DOI 10.1002/9781118398050
[3]   Estimation of small failure probabilities in high dimensions by subset simulation [J].
Au, SK ;
Beck, JL .
PROBABILISTIC ENGINEERING MECHANICS, 2001, 16 (04) :263-277
[4]   Efficient Analytical Fragility Function Fitting Using Dynamic Structural Analysis [J].
Baker, Jack W. .
EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA, 2015, 31 (01) :579-599
[5]   A probabilistic performance-based approach for mitigating the seismic pounding risk between adjacent buildings [J].
Barbato, M. ;
Tubaldi, E. .
EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2013, 42 (08) :1203-1219
[6]   Performance of Medium-to-High Rise Reinforced Concrete Frame Buildings with Masonry Infill in the 2015 Gorkha, Nepal, Earthquake [J].
Barbosa, Andre R. ;
Fahnestock, Larry A. ;
Fick, Damon R. ;
Gautam, Dipendra ;
Soti, Rajendra ;
Wood, Richard ;
Moaveni, Babak ;
Stavridis, Andreas ;
Olsen, Michael J. ;
Rodrigues, Hugo .
EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA, 2017, 33 :S197-S218
[7]   Improved seismic hazard model with application to probabilistic seismic demand analysis [J].
Bradley, Brendon A. ;
Dhakal, Rajesh P. ;
Cubrinovski, Misko ;
Mander, John B. ;
MacRae, Greg A. .
EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2007, 36 (14) :2211-2225
[8]   Probabilistic risk analysis of structural impact in seismic events for linear and nonlinear systems [J].
Chase, J. Geoffrey ;
Boyer, Florent ;
Rodgers, Geoffrey W. ;
Labrosse, Gregoire ;
MacRae, Gregory A. .
EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2014, 43 (10) :1565-1580
[9]   Building pounding damage observed in the 2011 Christchurch earthquake [J].
Cole, Gregory L. ;
Dhakal, Rajesh P. ;
Turner, Fred M. .
EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2012, 41 (05) :893-913
[10]   Fragility assessment of building structural systems in Mid-America [J].
Ellingwood, Bruce R. ;
Celik, Ozan Cem ;
Kinali, Kursat .
EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2007, 36 (13) :1935-1952