Magnetic Resonance (MR) Differential Diagnosis of Breast Tumors Using Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) on 1.5-T

被引:99
作者
Tsushima, Yoshito [1 ]
Takahashi-Taketomi, Ayako [1 ]
Endo, Keigo [1 ]
机构
[1] Gunma Univ Hosp, Dept Diagnost Radiol & Nucl Med, Gunma 3718511, Japan
关键词
breast tumor; magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI); apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC); meta-analysis; literature review; WEIGHTED MRI; LESIONS; CANCER; IMAGES; BODY;
D O I
10.1002/jmri.21854
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
To review the published reports concerning the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value evaluation for the differentiation between malignant and benign breast tumors, articles were searched with the inclusion criteria: (a) a 1.5-T unit was used; (b) the diagnostic criteria were clearly stated; (c) diffusion-weighted images (DWIs) were obtained, and ADC value was calculated; (d) ADC values of breast tumors were reported with mean +/- standard deviation (SD). Meta-analysis from 12 articles revealed that the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.89 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.85-0.91) and 0.77 (95% Cl, 0.69-0.84), respectively, and that only the maximum b factor correlated with the mean ADC values of malignant and benign tumors, and the noncancerous breast tissue (P< 0.05,P < 0.01, P< 0.05, respectively). In conclusion, ADC evaluation is useful for the differentiation between malignant and benign breast tumors.
引用
收藏
页码:249 / 255
页数:7
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   Basic principles of diffusion-weighted imaging [J].
Bammer, R .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2003, 45 (03) :169-184
[2]   PUBLICATION BIAS - A PROBLEM IN INTERPRETING MEDICAL DATA [J].
BEGG, CB ;
BERLIN, JA .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES A-STATISTICS IN SOCIETY, 1988, 151 :419-463
[3]   A RANDOM-EFFECTS REGRESSION-MODEL FOR METAANALYSIS [J].
BERKEY, CS ;
HOAGLIN, DC ;
MOSTELLER, F ;
COLDITZ, GA .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1995, 14 (04) :395-411
[4]   Breast lesions: Correlation of contrast medium enhancement patterns on MR images with histopathologic findings and tumor angiogenesis [J].
Buadu, LD ;
Murakami, J ;
Murayama, S ;
Hashiguchi, N ;
Sakai, S ;
Masuda, K ;
Toyoshima, S ;
Kuroki, S ;
Ohno, S .
RADIOLOGY, 1996, 200 (03) :639-649
[5]   SOME METHODS FOR STRENGTHENING THE COMMON X2 TESTS [J].
COCHRAN, WG .
BIOMETRICS, 1954, 10 (04) :417-451
[6]   Conducting systematic reviews of diagnostic studies: Didactic guidelines [J].
Devillé W.L. ;
Buntinx F. ;
Bouter L.M. ;
Montori V.M. ;
De Vet H.C.W. ;
Van Der Windt D.A.W.M. ;
Bezemer P.D. .
BMC Medical Research Methodology, 2 (1) :1-13
[7]   The diagnostic odds ratio: a single indicator of test performance [J].
Glas, AS ;
Lijmer, JG ;
Prins, MH ;
Bonsel, GJ ;
Bossuyt, PMM .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2003, 56 (11) :1129-1135
[8]   Differentiation of clinically benign and malignant breast lesions using diffusion-weighted imaging [J].
Guo, Y ;
Cai, YQ ;
Cai, ZL ;
Gao, YG ;
An, NY ;
Ma, L ;
Mahankali, S ;
Gao, JH .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2002, 16 (02) :172-178
[9]  
Hatakenaka M., 2008, MAGN RESON MED SCI, V7, P23, DOI DOI 10.2463/MRMS.7.23
[10]   Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses [J].
Higgins, JPT ;
Thompson, SG ;
Deeks, JJ ;
Altman, DG .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2003, 327 (7414) :557-560