A Scoping Review about the Characteristics and Success-Failure Rates of Temporary Anchorage Devices in Orthodontics

被引:12
作者
Jaramillo-Bedoya, Daniel [1 ]
Villegas-Giraldo, Gustavo [1 ]
Agudelo-Suarez, Andres A. [1 ]
Ramirez-Ossa, Diana Milena [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Antioquia, Fac Dent, Medellin 050010, Colombia
关键词
orthodontic anchorage procedures; orthodontic appliances; systematic review; MAXILLARY MOLAR DISTALIZATION; MINI-IMPLANT ANCHORAGE; EN-MASSE RETRACTION; ROOT PROXIMITY; MINISCREW-IMPLANTS; SKELETAL ANCHORAGE; INSERTION TORQUE; 3-DIMENSIONAL ANALYSIS; PREMOLAR EXTRACTION; SLIDING MECHANICS;
D O I
10.3390/dj10050078
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
This study synthesized the scientific evidence concerning the main characteristics of the Temporary Anchorage Devices (TADs) used in orthodontics and reported the success-failure rates during treatment. For that means, this scoping review collected articles from previous research. A complementary search was carried out in the databases PubMed-MEDLINE, Scopus, LILACS, and EMBASE, focusing on original studies published from 2010 to 2020. We analyzed the main characteristics of the publications. As a result, 103 articles were included. Most of the research was conducted among different groups, who needed TADs principally in the maxilla and an interradicular location between the second premolar and first molar. AbsoAnchor, Dentos Inc., Daegu, Korea, was the most used brand of TADs. The most common characteristics of the devices and biomechanics were a diameter and length of 1.6 mm and 8 mm, a self-drilled system, a closed technique for placement, immediate loading, and forces that ranged between 40 and 800 g. Of the studies, 47.6% showed success rates >= 90%. In conclusion, high success rates were found for TADs, and differences were found according to sociodemographic and clinical variables. The studies showed variability in methodological design, and scientific publications were concentrated in certain countries. We recommend further scientific research on TADs using more standardized designs.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 123 条
[1]   Effects of low-intensity laser therapy on the stability of orthodontic mini-implants: a randomised controlled clinical trial [J].
Abohabib, Ahmed Mohamed ;
Fayed, Mona Mohamed ;
Labib, Amr H. .
JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2018, 45 (03) :149-156
[2]   Miniscrew implant-supported maxillary canine retraction with and without corticotomy-facilitated orthodontics [J].
Aboul-Ela, Shadw Mohammed Badr El-Din ;
El-Beialy, Amr Ragab ;
El-Sayed, Karim Mohamed Fawzy ;
Selim, Essam Mohamed Nassef ;
EL-Mangoury, Nagwa Helmy ;
Mostafa, Yehya Ahmed .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2011, 139 (02) :252-259
[3]   Comparison of short-term effects between face mask and skeletal anchorage therapy with intermaxillary elastics in patients with maxillary retrognathia [J].
Aglarci, Cahide ;
Esenlik, Elcin ;
Findik, Yavuz .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2016, 38 (03) :313-323
[4]   Alveolar bone density changes around miniscrews: A prospective clinical study [J].
Al Maaitah, Emad F. ;
Safi, Ahmed A. M. ;
Abdelhafez, Reem S. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2012, 142 (06) :758-767
[5]  
Alhammadi Maged Sultan, 2018, Dental Press J. Orthod., V23, p40.e1, DOI 10.1590/2177-6709.23.6.40.e1-10.onl
[6]   Assessment of mini-implant displacement using cone beam computed tomography [J].
Alves, Matheus, Jr. ;
Baratieri, Carolina ;
Nojima, Lincoln Issamu .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2011, 22 (10) :1151-1156
[7]   Success rates and factors associated with failure of temporary anchorage devices: A prospective clinical trial [J].
Aly, Shehab A. ;
Alyan, Doha ;
Fayed, Mona S. ;
Alhammadi, Maged S. ;
Mostafa, Yehya A. .
JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE AND CLINICAL DENTISTRY, 2018, 9 (03) :e12331
[8]   Comparison of anterior and posterior mini-implant-assisted maxillary incisor intrusion: Root resorption and treatment efficiency [J].
Aras, Isil ;
Tuncer, Ali V. .
ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2016, 86 (05) :746-752
[9]   Effects of mandibular incisor intrusion obtained using a conventional utility arch vs bone anchorage [J].
Aydogdu, Esen ;
Ozsoy, Omur Polat .
ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2011, 81 (05) :767-775
[10]  
Azeem Muhammad, 2019, Dental Press J. Orthod., V24, P46, DOI 10.1590/2177-6709.24.5.046-051.oar