共 50 条
Lurasidone versus Quetiapine for Cognitive Impairments in Young Patients with Bipolar Depression: A Randomized, Controlled Study
被引:8
|作者:
Diao, Xiangyuan
[1
,2
]
Luo, Dan
[1
,3
]
Wang, Dandan
[1
]
Lai, Jianbo
[1
]
Li, Qunxiao
[4
]
Zhang, Peifen
[1
]
Huang, Huimin
[1
]
Wu, Lingling
[1
]
Lu, Shaojia
[1
]
Hu, Shaohua
[1
,5
,6
,7
]
机构:
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Sch Med, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Psychiat, Hangzhou 310003, Peoples R China
[2] Jiaxing Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Psychiat, Jiaxing 314001, Peoples R China
[3] Third Peoples Hosp Jiashan Cty, Dept Psychosomat, Jiaxing 314100, Peoples R China
[4] Hangzhou Fuyang Third Peoples Hosp, Dept Psychiat, Hangzhou 311402, Peoples R China
[5] Zhejiang Univ, Brain Res Inst, Hangzhou 310003, Peoples R China
[6] Zhejiang Engn Ctr Math Mental Hlth, Hangzhou 310003, Peoples R China
[7] Zhejiang Univ, Sch Med,MOE Frontier Sci Ctr Brain Sci & Brain Mac, Sch Brain Sci & Brain Med, NHC & CAMS Key Lab Med Neurobiol, Hangzhou 310003, Peoples R China
基金:
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词:
quetiapine;
lurasidone;
bipolar disorder;
cognition;
adolescent;
REVERSES MK-801-INDUCED IMPAIRMENT;
ATYPICAL ANTIPSYCHOTIC-DRUG;
DOUBLE-BLIND;
I DEPRESSION;
NEUROCOGNITIVE PERFORMANCE;
DISORDER;
ADOLESCENTS;
MEMORY;
YOUTH;
RECEPTORS;
D O I:
10.3390/ph15111403
中图分类号:
R914 [药物化学];
学科分类号:
100701 ;
摘要:
The clinical efficacy of lurasidone and quetiapine, two commonly prescribed atypical antipsychotics for bipolar depression, has been inadequately studied in young patients. In this randomized and controlled study, we aimed to compare the effects of these two drugs on cognitive function, emotional status, and metabolic profiles in children and adolescents with bipolar depression. We recruited young participants (aged 10-17 years old) with a DSM-5 diagnosis of bipolar disorder during a depressive episode, who were then randomly assigned to two groups and treated with flexible doses of lurasidone (60 to 120 mg/day) or quetiapine (300 to 600 mg/day) for consecutive 8 weeks, respectively. All the participants were clinically evaluated on cognitive function using the THINC-it instrument at baseline and week 8, and emotional status was assessed at baseline and the end of week 2, 4, and 8. Additionally, the changes in weight and serum metabolic profiles (triglyceride, cholesterol, and fasting blood glucose) during the trial were also analyzed. In results, a total of 71 patients were randomly assigned to the lurasidone group (n = 35) or the quetiapine group (n = 36), of which 31 patients completed the whole treatment course. After an 8-week follow-up, participants in the lurasidone group showed better performance in the Symbol Check Reaction and Accuracy Tests, when compared to those in the quetiapine group. No inter-group difference was observed in the depression scores, response rate, or remission rate throughout the trial. In addition, there was no significant difference in serum metabolic profiles between the lurasidone group and the quetiapine group, including triglyceride level, cholesterol level, and fasting blood glucose level. However, the quetiapine group presented a more apparent change in body weight than the lurasidone group. In conclusion, the present study provided preliminary evidence that quetiapine and lurasidone had an equivalent anti-depressive effect, and lurasidone appeared to be superior to quetiapine in improving the cognitive function of young patients with bipolar depression.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文