Models for midwifery care: A mapping review

被引:24
作者
Eri, Tine S. [1 ]
Berg, Marie [2 ,3 ]
Dahl, Bente [4 ]
Gottfreosdottir, Helga [5 ,6 ]
Sommerseth, Eva [4 ]
Prinds, Christina [7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Oslo Metropolitan Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Pilestredet 32, Oslo, Norway
[2] Univ Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska Acad, Inst Hlth & Care Sci, Gothenburg, Sweden
[3] Sahlgrens Univ Hosp, Obstret Unit, Gothenburg, Sweden
[4] Univ South Eastern Norway, Fac Hlth & Social Sci, Ctr Womens, Kongsberg, Norway
[5] Univ Iceland, Fac Nursing, Dept Midwifery, Reykjavik, Iceland
[6] Landspitali Univ Hosp, Womens Clin, Reykjavik, Iceland
[7] Univ Southern Denmark, Inst Clin Res, Odense C, Denmark
[8] Univ Coll South Denmark, Dept Res, Haderslev, Denmark
来源
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MIDWIFERY | 2020年 / 4卷
关键词
midwifery; salutogenesis; philosophy; maternity care; models for care; woman-centeredness;
D O I
10.18332/ejm/124110
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
INTRODUCTION According to WHO, midwives are found competent to provide evidence-based and normalcy-facilitating maternity care. Models for midwifery care exist, but seem to be lacking explicit epistemological status, mainly focusing on the practical and organizational level of care delivery. To make the values and attitudes of care visible, it is important to implement care models with explicit epistemological status. The aim of this paper is to identify and gain an overview of publications of theoretical models for midwifery care. METHODS A mapping review was conducted with systematic searches in nine databases for studies describing a theoretical model or theory for midwifery care that either did or was intended to impact clinical practice. Eligibility criteria were refined during the selection process. RESULTS Six models from six papers originating from different parts of the world were included in the study. The included models were developed using different methodologies and had different philosophical underpinnings and complexity gradients. Some characteristics were common, the most distinctive being the emphasis of the midwife-woman relationship, secondly the focus on woman-centeredness, and thirdly the salutogenic focus in care. CONCLUSIONS Overall, scarcity exists regarding theoretical models for midwifery care with explicit epistemological status. Further research is needed in order to develop generic theoretical models with an epistemological status to serve as a knowledge base for midwifery healthcare.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]   Understanding the social organisation of maternity care systems: midwifery as a touchstone [J].
Benoit, C ;
Wrede, S ;
Bourgeault, I ;
Sandall, J ;
De Vries, R ;
van Teijlingen, ER .
SOCIOLOGY OF HEALTH & ILLNESS, 2005, 27 (06) :722-737
[2]   A Midwifery Model of Care for Childbearing Women at High Risk: Genuine Caring in Caring for the Genuine [J].
Berg, Marie .
JOURNAL OF PERINATAL EDUCATION, 2005, 14 (01) :9-21
[3]   A midwifery model of woman-centred childbirth care - In Swedish and Icelandic settings [J].
Berg, Marie ;
Olafsdottir, Olof Asta ;
Lundgren, Ingela .
SEXUAL & REPRODUCTIVE HEALTHCARE, 2012, 3 (02) :79-87
[4]  
Booth A., 2012, Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review
[5]  
Bryar R, 2011, THEORY MIDWIFERY PRA
[6]  
Bryar R., 2011, Theory for midwifery practice, V2nd
[7]   Risk, theory, social and medical models: A critical analysis of the concept of risk in maternity care [J].
Bryers, Helen MacKenzie ;
van Teijlingen, Edwin .
MIDWIFERY, 2010, 26 (05) :488-496
[8]   'With woman' philosophy: examining the evidence, answering the questions [J].
Carolan, Mary ;
Hodnett, Ellen .
NURSING INQUIRY, 2007, 14 (02) :140-152
[9]   Maternal health: time for a radical reappraisal [J].
Ceschia, Audrey ;
Horton, Richard .
LANCET, 2016, 388 (10056) :2064-2066
[10]  
Church S, 2017, New thinking on improving maternity care: international perspectives