Resource Adequacy with Increasing Shares of Wind and Solar Power: A Comparison of European and US Electricity Market Designs

被引:9
作者
Botterud, Audun [1 ]
Auer, Hans [2 ]
机构
[1] MIT, Lab Informat & Decis Syst, 77 Massachusetts Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
[2] Vienna Univ Technol, Energy Econ Grp EEG, Inst Energy Syst & Elect Drives, Vienna, Austria
关键词
Electricity Market Design; Resource Adequacy; Renewable Electricity Generation; Europe; United States; Price Formation; Energy-Only Markets; Capacity Mechanisms; WHOLESALE MARKETS; GENERATION; RENEWABLES; LESSONS;
D O I
10.5547/2160-5890.9.2.abot
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We raise the question if improvements to current energy-only markets are sufficient to maintain resource adequacy in electricity markets or whether the rapid increase in wind and solar power gives stronger arguments for additional capacity mechanisms. A comparative analysis between Europe and the United States reveals some fundamental differences, but also many similarities in electricity market design on the two continents. We provide a list of general and specific recommendations for improved electricity markets and argue that lessons can and should be learned in both directions. The key to achieve a market-compatible integration of renewable energy is to focus on correct price formation in the short-term. Increased demand-side participation, improved pricing during scarcity conditions, and a transition from technology-specific subsidies of renewables towards adequate pricing of carbon emissions are important measures towards this end. In contrast, an increasing reliance on administrative capacity mechanisms would bring the industry back towards the centralized integrated resource planning that prevailed at the outset of electricity restructuring more than 25 years ago.
引用
收藏
页码:71 / 99
页数:29
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]  
ACER (Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators, 2013, CAP REM MERCH INT MA
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2017, Staff Report to the Secretary on Electricity Markets and Reliability
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2018, Achieving Our 100% Renewable Energy Purchasing Goal and Going Beyond
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2014, INT PART CAP REM MEC
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2017, TRENDS PROJ EU ETS 2
[6]   Design criteria for implementing a capacity mechanism in deregulated electricity markets [J].
Batlle, Carlos ;
Pérez-Arriaga, Ignacio J. .
Utilities Policy, 2008, 16 (03) :184-193
[7]   Expert survey on capacity markets in the US: Lessons for the EU [J].
Bhagwat, Pradyumna C. ;
de Vries, Laurens J. ;
Hobbs, Benjamin F. .
UTILITIES POLICY, 2016, 38 :11-17
[8]  
Borenstein S., 2016, IS COMMUNITY CHOICE
[9]  
Brattle Group Inc. Astrape Consulting, 2013, RES AD REQ REL EC IM
[10]  
BRC (Business Renewables Center, 2017, BRC DEALS TRACK