Measuring adaptive expertise: development and validation of an instrument

被引:29
作者
Carbonell, Katerina Bohle [1 ]
Koenings, Karen D. [1 ]
Segers, Mien [1 ]
van Merrienboer, Jeroen J. G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Maastricht Univ, Fac Hlth Med & Life Sci, Dept Educ Res & Dev, NL-6200 LM Maastricht, Netherlands
关键词
adaptive expertise; innovative skills; task variety; validation; CFA; CONFIRMATORY FACTOR-ANALYSIS; EXPLORATORY FACTOR-ANALYSIS; PERFORMANCE; DESIGN; WORLDS;
D O I
10.1080/1359432X.2015.1036858
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Individuals with adaptive expertise possess the skills to deal with novel problems. Whereas this concept has been around since the mid-1980s, no instrument exists that provides a good operationalization of the theoretical construct. This inhibits the further development of research on adaptive expertise and the evaluation of employees' adaptive expertise levels. Adaptive expertise has been unanimously described as a composition of domain-specific and innovative skills. Some researchers argue that metacognitive skills are also crucial. This study aimed to establish whether an instrument measuring adaptive expertise is composed of these three dimensions. In addition, it was tested whether such an instrument is influenced by task variety and work experience, as previously reported in literature. A sample of 383 professionals and graduates were used to test the Adaptive Expertise Inventory. Through exploratory factor analysis (EFA), (E/CFA), and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), the quality of the instrument was evaluated. Good model fit was achieved. The final instrument consisted of two dimensionsi.e., domain-specific and innovative skillswith five items each. Regression analysis showed that not work experience, but task variety is related to level of adaptive expertise. The Adaptive Expertise Inventory proved to be a valid instrument for measuring adaptive expertise.
引用
收藏
页码:167 / 180
页数:14
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]  
ALEXANDER PA, 1991, REV EDUC RES, V61, P315, DOI 10.3102/00346543061003315
[2]   Construct-oriented biodata: Capturing change-related and contextually relevant future performance [J].
Allworth, E ;
Hesketh, B .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SELECTION AND ASSESSMENT, 1999, 7 (02) :97-111
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1997, Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, DOI DOI 10.1080/0031383970410318
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2003, Educational Researcher
[5]  
Barnett S. M., 2002, Thinking & Reasoning, V8, P237, DOI 10.1080/13546780244000088
[6]   Active learning: Effects of core training design elements on self-regulatory processes, learning, and adaptability [J].
Bell, Bradford S. ;
Kozlowski, Steve W. J. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 93 (02) :296-316
[7]  
Bransford JD, 2009, DEVELOPMENT OF PROFESSIONAL EXPERTISE: TOWARD MEASUREMENT OF EXPERT PERFORMANCE AND DESIGN OF OPTIMAL LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS, P432, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511609817.023
[8]   The structure of perceived emotional control: Psychometric properties of a revised anxiety control questionnaire [J].
Brown, TA ;
White, KS ;
Forsyth, JP ;
Barlow, DH .
BEHAVIOR THERAPY, 2004, 35 (01) :75-99
[9]   A guide for the design and conduct of self-administered surveys of clinicians [J].
Burns, Karen E. A. ;
Duffett, Mark ;
Kho, Michelle E. ;
Meade, Maureen O. ;
Adhikari, Neill K. J. ;
Sinuff, Tasnim ;
Cook, Deborah J. .
CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2008, 179 (03) :245-252
[10]   How experts deal with novel situations: A review of adaptive expertise [J].
Carbonell, Kateriha Bohle ;
Stalmeijer, Renee E. ;
Konings, Karen D. ;
Seger, Mien ;
van Merrienboer, Jeroeri J. G. .
EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH REVIEW, 2014, 12 :14-29