Effect of primary motor cortex excitability changes after quadripulse transcranial magnetic stimulation on kinesthetic sensitivity: A preliminary study

被引:0
作者
Okawada, Megumi [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Kaneko, Fuminari [1 ,2 ]
Shibata, Eriko [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Sapporo Med Univ, Sch Hlth Sci, Div Phys Therapy 1, Chuo Ku, S1 W17, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
[2] Keio Univ, Dept Rehabil Med, Sch Med, Shjinjuku Ku, 35 Shinanomachi, Tokyo 1608582, Japan
[3] Hokuto Social Med Corp, Dept Rehabil, Hokuto Hosp, 7-5 Kisen,Inada Cho, Obihiro, Hokkaido, Japan
[4] Hokkaido Bunkyo Univ, Fac Human Sci, Dept Phys Therapy, 5-196-1 Koganechuo, Eniwa, Hokkaido 51961, Japan
关键词
Inesthetic perception; Joint motor detection threshold; Quadripulse; Transcranial; Magnetic stimulation; Primary motor cortex; KNEE-JOINT PROPRIOCEPTION; TENDON VIBRATION; OSTEOARTHRITIS; MOVEMENTS; ORGANIZATION; PERCEPTION; PLASTICITY; AFFERENTS; DIRECTION; AREAS;
D O I
10.1016/j.neulet.2020.135483
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Muscle spindles provide the greatest contribution to kinesthetic perception. Primary motor cortex (M1) excitability changes in parallel with the intensity of kinesthetic perception inputs from muscle spindles; M1 is therefore involved in kinesthetic perception. However, the causal relationship between changes in kinesthetic sensitivity and M1 excitability is unclear. The purpose of this study was to test whether artificially and sustainably modulated M1 excitability causes changes in kinesthetic sensitivity in healthy individuals. We evaluated motor evoked potentials (MEP) in Experiment 1 and joint motion detection thresholds (JMDT) in Experiment 2 before and after quadripulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (QPS). Nine healthy right-handed male volunteers were recruited. In each experiment, participants received QPS or sham stimulation (Sham) on separate days. MEP amplitude and JMDT were recorded before and at 0, 15, 30, 45, and 60 min after QPS and Sham. Our results showed that M1 excitability and kinesthetic sensitivity increased after QPS, whereas neither changed after Sham. In the five subjects who participated in both experiments, there was a significant moderate correlation between M1 excitability and kinesthetic sensitivity. Thus, the long-lasting change in kinesthetic sensitivity may be due to changes in M1 excitability. In addition, M1 may play a gain adjustment role in the neural pathways of muscle spindle input.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] Aok S., MULTIPLE COMP STEEL
  • [2] Updating of an internal model without proprioception: a deafferentation study
    Bernier, Pierre-Michel
    Chua, Romeo
    Bard, Chantal
    Franks, Ian M.
    [J]. NEUROREPORT, 2006, 17 (13) : 1421 - 1425
  • [3] SIGNALING OF KINESTHETIC INFORMATION BY PERIPHERAL SENSORY RECEPTORS
    BURGESS, PR
    WEI, JY
    CLARK, FJ
    SIMON, J
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF NEUROSCIENCE, 1982, 5 : 171 - 187
  • [4] Cortical correlates of illusory hand movement perception in humans:: A MEG study
    Casini, Laurence
    Romaiguere, Patricia
    Ducorps, Antoine
    Schwartz, Denis
    Anton, Jean-Luc
    Roll, Jean-Pierre
    [J]. BRAIN RESEARCH, 2006, 1121 : 200 - 206
  • [5] Illusory Sensation of Movement Induced by Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
    Christensen, Mark Schram
    Lundbye-Jensen, Jesper
    Grey, Michael James
    Vejlby, Alexandra Damgaard
    Belhage, Bo
    Nielsen, Jens Bo
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2010, 5 (10):
  • [6] Cutaneous receptors contribute to kinesthesia at the index finger, elbow, and knee
    Collins, DF
    Refshauge, KM
    Todd, G
    Gandevia, SC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2005, 94 (03) : 1699 - 1706
  • [7] Di Lazzaro V, 2001, EXP BRAIN RES, V138, P268
  • [8] Timing of bimanual movements and deafferentation: implications for the role of sensory movement effects
    Drewing, K
    Stenneken, P
    Cole, J
    Prinz, W
    Aschersleben, G
    [J]. EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2004, 158 (01) : 50 - 57
  • [9] KINESTHETIC SIGNALS AND MUSCLE-CONTRACTION
    GANDEVIA, SC
    MCCLOSKEY, DI
    BURKE, D
    [J]. TRENDS IN NEUROSCIENCES, 1992, 15 (02) : 62 - 65
  • [10] GILHODES JC, 1986, EXP BRAIN RES, V61, P395