A retrospective prognostic evaluation analysis using the 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for breast cancer

被引:38
作者
Lee, Sae Byul [1 ]
Sohn, Guiyun [1 ]
Kim, Jisun [1 ]
Chung, Il Yong [1 ]
Lee, Jong Won [1 ]
Kim, Hee Jeong [1 ]
Ko, Beom Seok [1 ]
Son, Byung Ho [1 ]
Ahn, Sei-Hyun [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ulsan, Coll Med, Dept Surg, Asan Med Ctr,Div Breast Surg, 88 Olymp Ro 43 Gil, Seoul 05505, South Korea
关键词
AJCC cancer staging; Biomarker; Breast cancer; Subtype; Prognostic factors; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; PRIMARY THERAPY; SUBTYPES; CLASSIFICATION; BIOMARKERS; FEATURES;
D O I
10.1007/s10549-018-4682-5
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose Breast cancer is a group of diseases with different intrinsic molecular subtypes. However, anatomic staging alone is insufficient to determine prognosis. The present study analyzed the prognostic value of the American Joint Committee for Cancer (AJCC) 8th edition cancer staging system. Methods This retrospective, single-center study included breast cancer cases diagnosed from January 1999 to December 2008. We restaged patients based on the 8th edition AJCC cancer staging system and analyzed the prognostic value of the anatomic and prognostic staged groups. Follow-up data including disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and clinic-pathological data were collected to analyze the differences between the two staging subgroups. Results The study enrolled 7458 breast cancer patients with a 98.7-month median follow-up. Both the 5-year DFS and OS were significantly different between the anatomic and prognostic staged groups. The 5-year OS according to disease subtype was as follows: hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative [HR(+)/HER2(-)], 90.9%; HR(+)/HER2(+), 84.7%; HR(-)/HER2(+), 81.1%; and HR(-)/HER2(-), 80.9%. According to the anatomic stage, the 5-year OS of patients with stage III HR(+)/HER2(-) disease was superior to that of patients with stage II HR(-)/HER2(-) disease (88.3 vs. 86.5%). Per the prognostic stage, both the 5-year DFS and OS rates of patients with stage II HR(-)/HER2(-) disease were higher than those of patients with stage III HR(+)/HER2(-) disease (90.1 and 94.3% vs. 79.1 and 88.9%). Conclusions The prognostic staging system is a refined version of the anatomic staging system and encourages a more personalized approach to breast cancer treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:257 / 266
页数:10
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   The Eighth Edition AJCC Cancer Staging Manual: Continuing to build a bridge from a population-based to a more "personalized" approach to cancer staging [J].
Amin, Mahul B. ;
Greene, Frederick L. ;
Edge, Stephen B. ;
Compton, Carolyn C. ;
Gershenwald, Jeffrey E. ;
Brookland, Robert K. ;
Meyer, Laura ;
Gress, Donna M. ;
Byrd, David R. ;
Winchester, David P. .
CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 2017, 67 (02) :93-99
[2]   Use of ER/PR/HER2 subtypes in conjunction with the 2007 St Gallen Consensus Statement for early breast cancer [J].
Bauer, Katrina ;
Parise, Carol ;
Caggiano, Vincent .
BMC CANCER, 2010, 10
[3]   Female Breast Cancer Status According to ER, PR and HER2 Expression: A Population Based Analysis [J].
Caldarella, Adele ;
Crocetti, Emanuele ;
Bianchi, Simonetta ;
Vezzosi, Vania ;
Urso, Carmelo ;
Biancalani, Mauro ;
Zappa, Marco .
PATHOLOGY & ONCOLOGY RESEARCH, 2011, 17 (03) :753-758
[4]   Race, breast cancer subtypes, and survival in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study [J].
Carey, Lisa A. ;
Perou, Charles M. ;
Livasy, Chad A. ;
Dressler, Lynn G. ;
Cowan, David ;
Conway, Kathleen ;
Karaca, Gamze ;
Troester, Melissa A. ;
Tse, Chiu Kit ;
Edmiston, Sharon ;
Deming, Sandra L. ;
Geradts, Joseph ;
Cheang, Maggie C. U. ;
Nielsen, Torsten O. ;
Moorman, Patricia G. ;
Earp, H. Shelton ;
Millikan, Robert C. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2006, 295 (21) :2492-2502
[5]   Radiation therapy and survival in breast cancer patients with 10 or more positive axillary lymph nodes treated with mastectomy [J].
Diab, SG ;
Hilsenbeck, SG ;
de Moor, C ;
Clark, GM ;
Osborne, CK ;
Ravdin, PM ;
Elledge, RM .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1998, 16 (05) :1655-1660
[6]   The American Joint Committee on Cancer: the 7th Edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual and the Future of TNM [J].
Edge, Stephen B. ;
Compton, Carolyn C. .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 17 (06) :1471-1474
[7]   Breast Cancer-Major Changes in the American Joint Committee on Cancer Eighth Edition Cancer Staging Manual [J].
Giuliano, Armando E. ;
Connolly, James L. ;
Edge, Stephen B. ;
Mittendorf, Elizabeth A. ;
Rugo, Hope S. ;
Solin, Lawrence J. ;
Weaver, Donald L. ;
Winchester, David J. ;
Hortobagyi, Gabriel N. .
CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 2017, 67 (04) :291-303
[8]   Strategies for subtypes-dealing with the diversity of breast cancer: highlights of the St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2011 [J].
Goldhirsch, A. ;
Wood, W. C. ;
Coates, A. S. ;
Gelber, R. D. ;
Thuerlimann, B. ;
Senn, H. -J. .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2011, 22 (08) :1736-1747
[9]   A proposal for a new classification of T4 breast cancer as stage IIIC: a report from the Korean Breast Cancer Society [J].
Kim, Hee Jeong ;
Kim, Hwa Jung ;
Lee, Sae Byul ;
Moon, Hyeong-Gon ;
Noh, Woo Chul ;
Cho, Young Up ;
Yoo, Youngbum ;
Ahn, Sei Hyun .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2015, 153 (01) :153-160
[10]   Characteristics and outcomes according to molecular subtypes of breast cancer as classified by a panel of four biomarkers using immunohistochemistry [J].
Park, Seho ;
Koo, Ja Seung ;
Kim, Min Suk ;
Park, Hyung Seok ;
Lee, Jun Sang ;
Lee, Jong Seok ;
Kim, Seung Il ;
Park, Byeong-Woo .
BREAST, 2012, 21 (01) :50-57