A technology review for regeneration of sulfur rich amine systems

被引:19
作者
Garg, Bharti [1 ]
Verheyen, T. Vincent [1 ]
Pearson, Pauline [2 ]
Feron, Paul [3 ]
Cousins, Ashleigh [4 ]
机构
[1] Federat Univ Australia, SABS, Churchill, Vic 3842, Australia
[2] CSIRO Energy, Melbourne, Vic 3168, Australia
[3] CSIRO Energy, Newcastle, NSW 2304, Australia
[4] CSIRO Energy, Brisbane, Qld 4069, Australia
关键词
CO2; capture; Flue gas desulfurisation; Amine regeneration; Sulfate; POSTCOMBUSTION CAPTURE; THERMAL-DEGRADATION; EXCHANGE-RESINS; CO2; CAPTURE; PILOT-PLANT; FLUE-GAS; MONOETHANOLAMINE; NANOFILTRATION; ABSORPTION; COAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijggc.2018.05.019
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Reducing the capital cost of post combustion CO2 capture by eliminating flue gas desulfurisation (FGD) pretreatment, requires management of the amines preferential SO2 absorption. Novel technologies such as CS-Cap restrict the impact of SO2 to only a small fraction of the amine inventory resulting in high sulfate burden amines. Traditional thermal reclamation of these spent absorbents has advantages regarding simplicity, but ranks poorly for industrial ecology around PCC. These amines require low energy regeneration technologies compatible with their physico-chemical properties that also maximise the potential for valorising by-products. This review summarises the sulfur chemistry and outlines several amine reclamation processes. It assesses the status of established and novel regeneration technologies for their applicability to high sulfur loaded amines. Should deep sulfur removal be required, a hybrid approach with initial bulk removal (as product) followed by a polishing step to further reduce sulfur is prospective. A preliminary estimation of the relative cost of using standard reclamation methods for treating Sulfur loaded CS-Cap absorbent revealed the cost would increase due to its higher sulfate burden despite comparable treatment volumes. Research gaps are identified which would enable better comparison between the costs of traditional FGD versus higher reclamation costs for combined capture technologies.
引用
收藏
页码:243 / 253
页数:11
相关论文
共 72 条
[1]  
Adams D., 2010, CCC169
[2]  
[Anonymous], EM SUBST OTH CO2 POW
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2007, FUT COAL OPT CARB CO
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2013, CARBON CAPTURE TECHN, V1-99
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2007, POST COMBUSTION CARB
[6]   Performance of MEA and amine-blends in the CSIRO PCC pilot plant at Loy Yang Power in Australia [J].
Artanto, Yuli ;
Jansen, James ;
Pearson, Pauline ;
Thong Do ;
Cottrell, Aaron ;
Meuleman, Erik ;
Feron, Paul .
FUEL, 2012, 101 :264-275
[7]   Reclaiming of degraded MEA solutions by electrodialysis: Results of ED pilot campaign at post-combustion CO2 capture pilot plant [J].
Bazhenov, Stepan ;
Rieder, Alexander ;
Schallert, Bernd ;
Vasilevsky, Vladimir ;
Unterberger, Sven ;
Grushevenko, Evgeniia ;
Volkov, Vladimir ;
Volkov, Alexey .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2015, 42 :593-601
[8]  
Bennett, 2002, HDB IND CRYSTALLISAT
[9]   An SO2 tolerant process for CO2 capture [J].
Beyad, Yaser ;
Puxty, Graeme ;
Wei, Steven ;
Yang, Nan ;
Xu, Dongyao ;
Maeder, Marcel ;
Burns, Robert ;
Meuleman, Erik ;
Feron, Paul .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2014, 31 :205-213
[10]  
Boczkowski A. M., 2015, WATER INJECTION SULF