National Variability in Neonatal Resuscitation Practices at the Limit of Viability

被引:33
作者
Arzuaga, Bonnie H. [1 ]
Meadow, William [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chicago Med, Corner Childrens Hosp, Dept Pediat, Sect Neonatol, Chicago, IL USA
关键词
extremely premature infants; practice variation; resuscitation; physician beliefs; physician religion; INFANTS PROTECTION ACT; GEOGRAPHIC-VARIATION; UNITED-STATES; SERVICES; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1055/s-0033-1354566
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective Delivery room management of extremely premature infants is not subjected to professional regulations. In the United States, legal definitions of human viability and statutes regulating elective abortions vary by state, placing providers in an often difficult position regarding whether to attempt resuscitation when faced with the delivery of an infant of 22 to 25 weeks gestation. The objective of this study was to delineate variations in delivery room resuscitation practices of periviable infants in the United States in 2012. Study Design Electronic survey was sent to the members of American Academy of Pediatrics Section of Perinatal Medicine. Chi-square, Fisher exact test, and multivariate logistic regression were performed. Results A total of 758 surveys returned out of which 637 were complete. Overall 68% of providers consider 23-week gestation to be the youngest age that should be resuscitated at parental request, while 25-week gestation is considered by 51% to be the youngest age of obligatory resuscitation even with parental refusal. Responses varied when providers were separated into geographical regions based on the U.S. Census Bureau (p < 0.05). When provided with delivery room scenarios, parental preference significantly affected resuscitation attempts of 22 to 25 weeks, but not 26-week infants. In scenarios of periviable elective terminations, providers' personal belief systems influenced management of aborted fetuses. Conclusions Regional practice variation exists independent of specific state laws. Parental request is the most important factor to providers resuscitating 22 to 25-week infants. Providers' personal belief systems influence infant management infrequently.
引用
收藏
页码:521 / 527
页数:7
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   Limits of Human Viability in the United States: A Medicolegal Review [J].
Arzuaga, Bonnie Hope ;
Lee, Ben Hokew .
PEDIATRICS, 2011, 128 (06) :1047-1052
[2]   Geographic variation in the appropriate use of cesarean delivery [J].
Baicker, Katherine ;
Buckles, Kasey S. ;
Chandra, Amitabh .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2006, 25 (05) :W355-W367
[3]   Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2001, Public Law No. 107-207 [J].
Boyle, D ;
Carlo, WA ;
Goldsmith, J ;
Halamek, L ;
Perlman, J ;
Wiswell, TE .
PEDIATRICS, 2003, 111 (03) :680-681
[4]   Racial and Ethnic Differences in Use of Intubation for Periviable Neonates [J].
Edmonds, Brownsyne Tucker ;
Fager, Corinne ;
Srinivas, Sindhu ;
Lorch, Scott .
PEDIATRICS, 2011, 127 (05) :E1120-E1127
[5]   GEOGRAPHIC-VARIATION IN THE TREATMENT OF LOCALIZED BREAST-CANCER [J].
FARROW, DC ;
HUNT, WC ;
SAMET, JM .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1992, 326 (17) :1097-1101
[6]  
Hale TM, 2011, J PERINAT MED, V39, P47, DOI 10.1515/jpm.2010.121
[7]   The ethics of neonatal resuscitation at the margins of viability: Informed consent and outcomes [J].
Janvier, A ;
Barrington, KJ .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2005, 147 (05) :579-585
[8]   Relationship between site of training and residents' attitudes about neonatal resuscitation [J].
Janvier, Annie ;
Barrington, Keith ;
Deschenes, Marianne ;
Couture, Elise ;
Nadeau, Sophie ;
Lantos, John .
ARCHIVES OF PEDIATRICS & ADOLESCENT MEDICINE, 2008, 162 (06) :532-537
[9]   The best-interest standard is not applied for neonatal resuscitation decisions [J].
Janvier, Annie ;
Leblanc, Isabelle ;
Barrington, Keith James .
PEDIATRICS, 2008, 121 (05) :963-969
[10]   Medical staff guidelines for periviability pregnancy counseling and medical treatment of extremely premature infants [J].
Kaempf, JW ;
Tomlinson, M ;
Arduza, C ;
Anderson, S ;
Campbell, B ;
Ferguson, LA ;
Zabari, M ;
Stewart, VT .
PEDIATRICS, 2006, 117 (01) :22-29